ArticleGMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW2023
Fournier gangrene - would you KISS it?
Article in GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Necrotizing Fasciitis (2025 Edition).Burns & trauma · 2025Article
- Fournier's gangrene: a review of predictive scoring systems and practical guide for patient management.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fournier gangrene is a disease characterized by necrotizing fasciitis of the perineal and genital region, resulting from synergistic polymicrobiotic infection. Most infections can be localized to a cutaneous, urethral, or rectal source and can culminate in a fulminant sepsis. Current state of the art is systemic broad-spectrum antibiotics and serial aggressive debridement which result in superficial perineal defect of wide dimensions. We compiled all the cases of Fournier gangrene that required reconstruction after debridement in Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central from 2018 to 2022. Inclusion criteria were reconstruction for Fournier defects and patients' age 18 to 90 years old. Exclusion criteria were patients who didn't require reconstruction or didn't complete it due to death or transfer to another healthcare institution. Reconstructive procedures and complication rates are reported as whole numbers and percentages of total. The initial search yielded 32 patients. There were 2 (6.2%) patients with defects that healed by secondary intention, 6 (18.7%) with delayed primary closure, 4 (12.5%) with implantation of the testicle in a medial thigh pocket, 12 (37.5%) with skin grafts, 4 (12.5%) with scrotal advancement flaps, 2 (6.2%) with flaps, and 2 (6.2%) with flaps and skin grafts in combination. Four outcomes were evaluated: number of patients, defect size, method of reconstruction, and wound-healing complications. Most reconstructive techniques provide reliable coverage and protection of testicular function with an acceptable cosmetic result. The reconstructive options need to be patient tailored in order to achieve long lasting results with a minimum of postoperative morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.