Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38111741›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2023

Level and influencing factors of transition shock among new nurses in China: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Lili Yao, Jie Chen, Qinghua Zhao, Dingqun Bai, Yuerong Li, Mingzhao Xiao, Yanhui Du, Ling Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lili YaoDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.ORCID 0000-0003-0161-6520
Jie ChenDepartment of orthopaedics The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Qinghua ZhaoDepartment of Nursing The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Dingqun BaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Yuerong LiDepartment of Anesthesiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Mingzhao XiaoDepartment of Urology The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Yanhui DuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Ling LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: New nurses are an important part of nursing teams. The failure of new nurses to successfully transition seriously affects personal career development and nursing work quality, and important influencing factors deserve the attention of nursing managers. At present, multicenter, large-sample investigations of transition shock among new nurses are lacking in China. This study aims to investigate the current level and influencing factors of transition shock among new nurses in China. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study with 3414 new nurses from 16 provinces in 7 regions in China from October 22, 2021, to November 8, 2021. We used the snowball sampling method and an online questionnaire produced by the researchers to collect data; the questionnaire included questions on demographic information, a transition shock scale for new nurses and open-ended questions. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24. Results: The effective response rate of this study was 97.89%, with 3342 effective participants from 189 hospitals in China, most of whom were female (94.88%). The study showed that the transition shock of new nurses in China was at a moderate level, with pre-job anxiety, unsatisfactory welfare treatment, resignation intention, adverse events, poor sleep quality, 1 or fewer exercise sessions per week, inability to balance work and life, and gluttony negatively affecting the transition shock of new nurses in China. Psychological shock was the strongest among the four dimensions of transition shock. Conclusions: The transition shock of new nurses, especially their psychological shock, deserves more attention from international society. Nursing managers should continue to take supportive measures to intervene in the factors influencing transition shock, with the aim of reducing the level of transition for new nurses, promoting their personal thriving, improving the quality of nursing work and increasing the retention rate of nurses.

Indexed as

Chinainfluencing factornew nursesnurse retentionpsychological shocksurveytransition shock

Identifiers

PMID38111741
PMCPMC10726909
OpenAlexW4389914032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.