ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2020
Bayesian Double Feature Allocation for Phenotyping with Electronic Health Records.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-way overlapping clustering by Bayesian tensor decomposition.Statistics and its interface · 2024Article
- A Unified Bayesian Framework for Bi-overlapping-Clustering Multi-omics Data via Sparse Matrix Factorization.Statistics in biosciences · 2023Article
- A Joint MLE Approach to Large-Scale Structured Latent Attribute Analysis.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2023Article
- Bayesian biclustering for microbial metagenomic sequencing data via multinomial matrix factorization.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- A Bayesian approach to restricted latent class models for scientifically structured clustering of multivariate binary outcomes.Biometrics · 2021Article
- Consensus Monte Carlo for Random Subsets using Shared Anchors.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHR) provide opportunities for deeper understanding of human phenotypes - in our case, latent disease - based on statistical modeling. We propose a categorical matrix factorization method to infer latent diseases from EHR data. A latent disease is defined as an unknown biological aberration that causes a set of common symptoms for a group of patients. The proposed approach is based on a novel double feature allocation model which simultaneously allocates features to the rows and the columns of a categorical matrix. Using a Bayesian approach, available prior information on known diseases (e.g., hypertension and diabetes) greatly improves identifiability and interpretability of the latent diseases. We assess the proposed approach by simulation studies including mis-specified models and comparison with sparse latent factor models. In the application to a Chinese EHR data set, we identify 10 latent diseases, each of which is shared by groups of subjects with specific health traits related to lipid disorder, thrombocytopenia, polycythemia, anemia, bacterial and viral infections, allergy, and malnutrition. The identification of the latent diseases can help healthcare officials better monitor the subjects' ongoing health conditions and look into potential risk factors and approaches for disease prevention. We cross-check the reported latent diseases with medical literature and find agreement between our discovery and reported findings elsewhere. We provide an R package "dfa" implementing our method and an R shiny web application reporting the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.