Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38111601›Full record

ReviewTranslational animal science2023

Turmeric (

Foluke Abimbola Aderemi, Olufemi Mobolaji Alabi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational animal science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Foluke Abimbola AderemiAnimal Science and Fisheries Management Unit, Agriculture Programme, Bowen University, Iwo, Nigeria.
Olufemi Mobolaji AlabiAnimal Science and Fisheries Management Unit, Agriculture Programme, Bowen University, Iwo, Nigeria.
Bowen University · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Turmeric, a common spice in many countries has been used for centuries in traditional medicine for its antimicrobial properties. Recent research has shown that turmeric can be a viable alternative to antibiotics in poultry production. Antibiotic overuse in poultry has led to the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which poses a threat to both animal and human health. Turmeric contains curcumin, a compound that has been shown to have antimicrobial activity against a wide range of bacteria, including those resistant to antibiotics. In addition, turmeric has anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, which can help boost the immune system of poultry and reduce the need for antibiotics. Studies have shown that turmeric can improve growth performance, and gut health, and reduce the incidence of disease in poultry. Therefore, the use of turmeric as an alternative to antibiotics in poultry production has the potential to not only improve animal health and welfare but also contribute to the fight against antibiotic resistance. This review aims to provide an overview of the recent knowledge on the use of these plant extracts in poultry feeds as feed additives and their effects on poultry performance.

Indexed as

antibioticshealthimmunitynutritionpoultryturmeric

Identifiers

PMID38111601
PMCPMC10727472
OpenAlexW4389242872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.