ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023
Generating synthetic images from cone beam computed tomography using self-attention residual UNet for head and neck radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Equivariant conditional diffusion model for head and neck CT image synthesis from CBCT.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Synthetic CT generation from cone-beam CT using deep learning for head-and-neck adaptive radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Enhancing CBCT-based CT synthesis using planning MRI in adaptive proton therapy for head cancer: A deep learning approach.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Geometry-encoded deep learning (GeoDL) framework for real-time 3D dose verification for online adaptive radiotherapy.Machine learning. Health · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for CT Synthesis in Radiotherapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A systematic review of the role of artificial intelligence in automating computed tomography-based adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Review
- Synthetic CT generation from CBCT using deep learning for adaptive radiotherapy in prostate cancer.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Proton dose calculation on cone-beam computed tomography using unsupervised 3D deep learning networks.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- A treatment-site-specific evaluation of commercial synthetic computed tomography solutions for proton therapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- MARes-Net: multi-scale attention residual network for jaw cyst image segmentation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Accurate CT numbers in Cone Beam CT (CBCT) are crucial for precise dose calculations in adaptive radiotherapy (ART). This study aimed to generate synthetic CT (sCT) from CBCT using deep learning (DL) models in head and neck (HN) radiotherapy. Materials and methods: A novel DL model, the 'self-attention-residual-UNet' (ResUNet), was developed for accurate sCT generation. ResUNet incorporates a self-attention mechanism in its long skip connections to enhance information transfer between the encoder and decoder. Data from 93 HN patients, each with planning CT (pCT) and first-day CBCT images were used. Model performance was evaluated using two DL approaches (non-adversarial and adversarial training) and two model types (2D axial only vs. 2.5D axial, sagittal, and coronal). ResUNet was compared with the traditional UNet through image quality assessment (Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Peak-Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM)) and dose calculation accuracy evaluation (DVH deviation and gamma evaluation (1 %/1mm)). Results: Image similarity evaluation results for the 2.5D-ResUNet and 2.5D-UNet models were: MAE: 46±7 HU vs. 51±9 HU, PSNR: 66.6±2.0 dB vs. 65.8±1.8 dB, and SSIM: 0.81±0.04 vs. 0.79±0.05. There were no significant differences in dose calculation accuracy between DL models. Both models demonstrated DVH deviation below 0.5 % and a gamma-pass-rate (1 %/1mm) exceeding 97 %. Conclusions: ResUNet enhanced CT number accuracy and image quality of sCT and outperformed UNet in sCT generation from CBCT. This method holds promise for generating precise sCT for HN ART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.