ArticleCureus2023
A Spontaneous Renal Calyceal Rupture Mimicking Physiologic Changes of Pregnancy and Other Common Pathologies.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A spontaneous renal calyceal rupture in pregnancy is extremely rare and can be challenging to identify as its presentation can mimic other more common diagnoses, which can lead to a delay in management. Here, we describe an unusual case of renal calyceal rupture in a 24-year-old G2P0010 female with pregnancy at 26.5 weeks gestation age (WGA) who was admitted to the antepartum ward due to left flank pain and uterine contractions. A renal sonogram was performed, which revealed severe left hydronephrosis and the absence of the ipsilateral ureteral jet. Urinalysis was within normal limits, and her renal function was preserved. Laboratories were remarkable for elevated liver enzymes. Finally, an abdominopelvic MRI revealed the culprit, a calyceal rupture. Once the diagnosis was clear, a double J-stent was inserted using limited fluoroscopy with the goal of reducing intrarenal pressure and decreasing disease morbidity. The patient's symptoms significantly improved after double J-stent placement and resolved the following day. The patient further developed preeclampsia with severe features, which has previously been documented to occur in pregnant patients with renal tract ruptures. The diagnosis of a renal calyceal rupture in pregnancy is not straightforward, in part because of a lack of awareness of this pathology. Nevertheless, early identification can prevent unnecessary interventions and adverse outcomes. Its diagnosis can be made with MRI, and its management with ureteral stent placement shouldn't be delayed, and its association with preeclampsia should be further explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.