Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38111370›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2023

Comparing the immune response and protective effect of COVID-19 vaccine under different vaccination strategies.

Tianyi Zhao, Xiaoping Huang, Yuelong Shu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Post-Vaccination COVID-19 Infection among Health Care Workers: Description, Determinants, and Event-History Analysis.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianyi ZhaoSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaoping HuangSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
Yuelong ShuSchool of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although highly infectious respiratory viral infections spread rapidly, humans have evolved a precise and complex immune mechanism to deal with respiratory viruses, with strong intrinsic, highly adaptive and specific humoral and cellular immunity. At the same time, vaccination against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is one of the most cost-effective and efficient means of preventing morbidity, severe illness, and death from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As the global epidemic of COVID-19 continues to evolve and vaccines are being developed, it is important to conduct studies on immunization strategies to optimize vaccination strategies when appropriate. This review was conducted to investigate the relationship between the immune response and the protective effect of different vaccination scenarios (including booster, sequential and hybrid immunity), and to provide a basis for the optimization of vaccination strategies and the development of new vaccines in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunity, CellularSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesViral VaccinesCOVID-19 vaccineimmune responseimmunization strategies

Identifiers

PMID38111370
PMCPMC10732654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.