Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38111335›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2023

Impulsivity, decision-making, and risk behavior in bipolar disorder and major depression from bipolar multiplex families.

Almudena Ramírez-Martín, Lea Sirignano, Fabian Streit, Jerome C Foo, Andreas J Forstner, Josef Frank, Markus M Nöthen, Jana Strohmaier, Stephanie H Witt, Fermin Mayoral-Cleries and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Almudena Ramírez-MartínDepartment of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Malaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain.
Lea SirignanoDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Fabian StreitDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Jerome C FooDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Andreas J ForstnerSchool of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Josef FrankDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Markus M NöthenSchool of Medicine & University Hospital Bonn, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Jana StrohmaierDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Stephanie H WittDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Fermin Mayoral-CleriesDepartment of Mental Health, University General Hospital of Malaga, Biomedical Research Institute of Malaga (IBIMA), Malaga, Spain.
Berta Moreno-KüstnerDepartment of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Marcella RietschelDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Jose Guzmán-ParraDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1463-6435
Heidelberg University · DEInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga · ESUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

Andalusian regional Health and Innovation Government PI-0060-2017ASD-Net 01EE1409CEMBED-impact of Early life MetaBolic and psychosocial strEss on susceptibility to mental Disorders; from converging epigenetic signatures to novel targets for therapeutic intervention 01EW1904FOR2107 NO246/10-2FOR2107 RI908/11-2FOR2107 WI3439/3-2German Federal Ministry of Education and ResearchGerman Research FoundationIntegrated Network IntegraMent 01ZX1314AIntegrated Network IntegraMent 01ZX1314GIntegrated Network IntegraMent 01ZX1614GSynSchiz-Linking synaptic dysfunction to disease mechanisms in schizophrenia-a multilevel investigation 01EW1810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBipolar disorder (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) are characterized by specific alterations of mood. In both disorders, alterations in cognitive domains such as impulsivity, decision-making, and risk-taking have been reported. Identification of similarities and differences of these domains in BD and MDD could give further insight into their etiology. The present study assessed impulsivity, decision-making, and risk-taking behavior in BD and MDD patients from bipolar multiplex families.

methodsEighty-two participants (BD type I, n = 25; MDD, n = 26; healthy relatives (HR), n = 17; and healthy controls (HC), n = 14) underwent diagnostic interviews and selected tests of a cognitive battery assessing neurocognitive performance across multiple subdomains including impulsivity (response inhibition and delay aversion), decision-making, and risk behavior. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) were used to analyze whether the groups differed in the respective cognitive domains.

resultsParticipants with BD and MDD showed higher impulsivity levels compared to HC; this difference was more pronounced in BD participants. BD participants also showed lower inhibitory control than MDD participants. Overall, suboptimal decision-making was associated with both mood disorders (BD and MDD). In risk-taking behavior, no significant impairment was found in any group. LIMITATIONS: As sample size was limited, it is possible that differences between BD and MDD may have escaped detection due to lack of statistical power.

conclusionsOur findings show that alterations of cognitive domains-while present in both disorders-are differently associated with BD and MDD. This underscores the importance of assessing such domains in addition to mere diagnosis of mood disorders.

Indexed as

bipolar disorderbipolar multiplex familiesdecision-makingimpulsivitymajor depression disorderrisk behavior

Identifiers

PMID38111335
PMCPMC10897498
OpenAlexW4389938794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.