ArticleBMC psychology2023
The influence of resource-gaining capacity on mate preferences: an eye tracking study.
Article in BMC psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Image of the Family and Orienting Image of Attachment: A Psychosemantic Approach.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2025Article
- Understanding Female and Male Insights in Psychology: Who Thinks What?Journal of lifestyle medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate whether resource-gaining capacity influences mate preferences, explicit (self-report data) and implicit tasks (eye tracking data) were used to explore whether individuals' resource-gaining capacity influences mate preferences and whether there are sex differences in mate preferences under two different conditions (short-term and long-term strategies). A total of 59 college students completed a questionnaire collecting basic demographic information, the Resource-Gaining Capacity Scale and the two above tasks. The results showed that (1) in the short-term mating, individuals with higher resource-gaining capacity paid more attention to "good parent" than those with lower resource-gaining capacity, while individuals with lower resource-gaining capacity preferred "good provider" than those with higher resource-gaining capacity. (2) In the long-term mating, women valued "good provider" traits more than men, and they paid more attention to "good parent" traits than men in the short-term. In addition, no matter in the short-term or the long-term mating, men placed more value on "good genes" traits than women. (3) Compared with long-term mating, individuals of both sexes had preferences based on "good genes" in short-term mating, while they had preferences based on "good parent" and "good provider" in long-term mating compared with short-term mating. (4) Regarding explicit mate selection, "good parent" traits were most preferred by the participants, while the implicit eye tracking data indicated that participants preferred partners who were "good providers" and had "good genes".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.