ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024
Intercalary Prosthetic Reconstruction with Three-Dimensional-Printed Custom-Made Porous Component for Defects of Long Bones with Short Residual Bone Segments After Tumor Resection.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-specific implants for joint-sparing reconstruction of segmental tibial and femoral defects : systematic literature review and introduction of a classification framework.Bone & joint research · 2026Pooled it
- Exploring the optimal reconstruction strategy for Enneking III defects in pelvis bone tumors: a finite element analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Selective laser melting fabrication of functionally graded macro-porous Ti-6Al-4V scaffold for cavity bone defect reconstruction.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- [Research progress in repair and reconstruction of tumor-related bone defects in proximal femur].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntercalary reconstruction for patients with short residual bone segments remains challenging. Three-dimensional (3D)-printed custom-made porous implants are a promising technique for short-segment fixation in these patients. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of 3D-printed custom-made porous components (3DCPCs) for short-segment fixation, focusing on prosthesis survivorship, radiographic results, and potential complications.
methodsThis retrospective study involved 39 patients who underwent intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with 3DCPCs after tumor resection of the femur, tibia, or humerus from June 2015 to October 2020. Segment bone loss involved the femur (n = 15), tibia (n = 16), and humerus (n = 8), leaving 78 residual bone segments. There were 46 short segments requiring 46 3DCPCs and 32 segments with the ability to accommodate 32 off-the-shelf standard uncemented stems for prosthesis fixation. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated. Prosthesis-overall survivorship and prosthesis-specific survivorship were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Radiographic results and modes of failure of using this technique were also examined.
resultsThe mean follow-up was 41 months. The prosthesis-overall survivorship was 87.2% and 84.6% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The prosthesis-specific survivorship was 92.1% and 89.5% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. There was not a substantial difference in prosthesis survivorship among the femur, tibia, and humerus. The average MSTS score was 26.2, ranging from 22 to 28. The radiographic evaluation results revealed excellent or good interface (38/46) in most of the 46 porous components. A total of 38 of 46 bone segments' remolding demonstrated no change. In total, seven patients (16.3%) had complications requiring further surgery.
conclusionThe prosthesis survivorship of using 3DCPCs for short-segment fixation is similar or better compared to other studies involving intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with short-segment fixation. Radiographic evaluation revealed good osteointegration and avoidance of stress shielding. Overall, intercalary prosthetic reconstruction with 3DCPC is a feasible modality for patients with short residual bone segments after tumor resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.