Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38111050›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2023

A super-pangenome of the North American wild grape species.

Noé Cochetel, Andrea Minio, Andrea Guarracino, Jadran F Garcia, Rosa Figueroa-Balderas, Mélanie Massonnet, Takao Kasuga, Jason P Londo, Erik Garrison, Brandon S Gaut and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The dynamics of introgression and parallel adaptation across North AmericanProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Accessing crop genetic diversity via pangenomics.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Noé CochetelDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3395-9536
Andrea MinioDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2643-9209
Andrea GuarracinoDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-131X
Jadran F GarciaDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5883-4820
Rosa Figueroa-BalderasDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3321-1376
Mélanie MassonnetDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0993-9148
Takao KasugaCrops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-0908
Jason P LondoHorticulture Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell AgriTech, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0535-4820
Erik GarrisonDepartment of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3821-631X
Brandon S GautDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1334-5556
Dario CantuDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA. dacantu@ucdavis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4858-1508

Funding

National Science Foundation 1741627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapturing the genetic diversity of wild relatives is crucial for improving crops because wild species are valuable sources of agronomic traits that are essential to enhance the sustainability and adaptability of domesticated cultivars. Genetic diversity across a genus can be captured in super-pangenomes, which provide a framework for interpreting genomic variations.

resultsHere we report the sequencing, assembly, and annotation of nine wild North American grape genomes, which are phased and scaffolded at chromosome scale. We generate a reference-unbiased super-pangenome using pairwise whole-genome alignment methods, revealing the extent of the genomic diversity among wild grape species from sequence to gene level. The pangenome graph captures genomic variation between haplotypes within a species and across the different species, and it accurately assesses the similarity of hybrids to their parents. The species selected to build the pangenome are a great representation of the genus, as illustrated by capturing known allelic variants in the sex-determining region and for Pierce's disease resistance loci. Using pangenome-wide association analysis, we demonstrate the utility of the super-pangenome by effectively mapping short reads from genus-wide samples and identifying loci associated with salt tolerance in natural populations of grapes.

conclusionsThis study highlights how a reference-unbiased super-pangenome can reveal the genetic basis of adaptive traits from wild relatives and accelerate crop breeding research.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantVitisGenomicsNorth AmericaPlant BreedingGrapevinePan-GWASSuper-pangenomeVitis genusWild species

Identifiers

PMID38111050
PMCPMC10729490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.