ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2023
Clinical value of station 4R node dissection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany controversies still exist concerning the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The objective of this study was to explore the characteristics of 4R metastasis and evaluate the clinical value of 4R node dissection in ESCC.
methodsA total of 736 ESCC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy between 2005 and 2013 were retrospectively collected, among which 393 ones underwent 4R dissection. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was applied to reduce the effects of confounding variables between the 4R dissection and non-dissection groups to analyze overall survival.
resultsPatients showed a low 4R metastasis rate of 5.1% (20/393) (5.2%, 5.8%, and 1.8% for upper, middle, and lower tumors, respectively). Correlation analyses identified that 4R metastasis was significantly associated with station 2R metastasis (p < 0.001) and pathologic tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) stage (p < 0.001). All 4R metastases were observed in stages IIIB and IVA. Moreover, patients with station 4R dissection failed to achieve significantly improved overall survival compared with those without 4R dissection, regardless of tumor stage (overall: p = 0.696; stage 0-IIIA: p = 0.317; stage IIIB-IVA: p = 0.619).
conclusion4R metastasis is likely to be associated with more aggressive disease, and routine 4R node dissection might not be necessary for ESCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.