Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38110896›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical andrology2023

Which inflammatory marker, between systemic immune-inflammation index and neutrophil to eosinophil ratio, is associated with Peyronie's disease and are there any implications for a better understanding of its mechanisms?

Felice Crocetto, Ciro Imbimbo, Biagio Barone, Davide Turchino, Umberto Marcello Bracale, Antonio Peluso, Marco Panagrosso, Alfonso Falcone, Benito Fabio Mirto, Luigi De Luca and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical andrology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Felice CrocettoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Ciro ImbimboDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Biagio BaroneDivision of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, AORN Sant'Anna e San Sebastiano, 81100, Caserta, Italy. Biagio.barone@aorncaserta.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4884-132X
Davide TurchinoDepartment of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Umberto Marcello BracaleDepartment of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Antonio PelusoDepartment of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Marco PanagrossoDepartment of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Alfonso FalconeDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Benito Fabio MirtoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Luigi De LucaDivision of Urology, AORN "Antonio Cardarelli", Naples, Italy.
Enrico SicignanoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Francesco Del GiudiceDepartment of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Gian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology and Organ Transplantation, University of Foggia, 71122, Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe LucarelliUrology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Gaetano GiampagliaDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Celeste ManfrediDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131, Naples, Italy.
Matteo FerroDepartment of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni TarantinoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II Medical School of Naples, Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITOspedale Sant'Anna · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeyronie's disease affects up to 9% of men and is often accompanied by pain and/or erectile dysfunction. It is characterized by an inflammatory process that is the grassroots of the subsequent fibrosis stage. There is an unmet need to evaluate its onset and progression. Among the newly proposed biomarkers of inflammation, authors developed a novel systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) based on lymphocyte, neutrophil, and platelet counts. Similarly, a recent study reported that a neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) represents systemic inflammation.

resultsA 49-patient group with Peyronie's disease as confronted with 50 well-matched for age and BMI controls. As laboratory evaluation of inflammation, SII, NER and the eosinophil to neutrophil ratio (ENR) were studied. As a likely risk factor for the presence of Peyronie's disease, a higher prevalence of hypercholesterolemia, hyperglycemia and hypertension was discovered in the patients compared to controls. A significant difference was found in the median values of the NER between the two selected groups, i.e., 32.5 versus 17.3 (p = 0.0021). As expected, also ENR was significantly different. The receiver operating characteristic curves for SII, ENR and NER were 0.55, 0.32 and 0.67, respectively, highlighting the best performance of NER. The cut-off for NER was 12.1, according to the Youden test.

conclusionsAccording to our results, any evaluation of circulating eosinophil, evaluated as NER, beyond being a signature of immuno-inflammatory response, help assess tissue homeostasis, since eosinophils are now considered multifunctional leukocytes and give a picture of the inflammatory process and repair process belonging to Peyronie's disease.

Indexed as

Eosinophil to neutrophil ratioImmuno-inflammatory responseNeutrophil-to-eosinophil ratioPeyronie’s diseaseSystemic immune-inflammation index

Identifiers

PMID38110896
PMCPMC10729439
OpenAlexW4389904055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.