Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38110839›Full record

ReviewAnnals of neurology2024

Biomarker Qualification for Neurofilament Light Chain in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Theory and Practice.

Michael Benatar, Lyle W Ostrow, Joseph W Lewcock, Frank Bennett, Jeremy Shefner, Robert Bowser, Paul Larkin, Lucie Bruijn, Joanne Wuu

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The spectrum of behavioral disorders in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current view.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael BenatarDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4241-5135
Lyle W OstrowDepartment of Neurology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7158-5243
Joseph W LewcockCReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.
Frank BennettCReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.
Jeremy ShefnerCReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.
Robert BowserCReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.ORCID 0000-0001-5404-7259
Paul LarkinThe ALS Association, Arlington, VA, USA.
Lucie BruijnCReATe Biomarkers External Advisory Committee.
Joanne WuuDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Barrow Neurological Institute · USUniversity of Miami · USAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Association · USCREATe Centre · GBDenali Therapeutics (United States) · USIonis Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USNovartis (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Uncovering new genes and disease modifiers for ALS and related disordersU54NS092091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LINDSAY N ALFANO · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
Multi-Center ALS Biomarker Validation Study (CReATe Biomarkers)U01NS107027 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BENATAR, MICHAEL, MALASPINA, ANDREA · 2018 to 2023
$3.5M
NIH HHS U01 NS107027NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS107027NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS092091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore whether the utility of neurofilament light chain (NfL), as a biomarker to aid amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development, would be enhanced by obtaining formal qualification from the US Food and Drug Administration for a defined context-of-use.

methodsConsensus discussion among academic, industry, and patient advocacy group representatives.

resultsA wealth of scientific evidence supports the use of NfL as a prognostic, response, and potential safety biomarker in the broad ALS population, and as a risk/susceptibility biomarker among the subset of SOD1 pathogenic variant carriers. Although NfL has not yet been formally qualified for any of these contexts-of-use, the US Food and Drug Administration has provided accelerated approval for an SOD1-lowering antisense oligonucleotide, based partially on the recognition that a reduction in NfL is reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit.

interpretationThe increasing incorporation of NfL into ALS therapy development plans provides evidence that its utility-as a prognostic, response, risk/susceptibility, and/or safety biomarker-is already widely accepted by the community. The willingness of the US Food and Drug Administration to base regulatory decisions on rigorous peer-reviewed data-absent formal qualification, leads us to conclude that formal qualification, despite some benefits, is not essential for ongoing and future use of NfL as a tool to aid ALS therapy development. Although the balance of considerations for and against seeking NfL biomarker qualification will undoubtedly vary across different diseases and contexts-of-use, the robustness of the published data and careful deliberations of the ALS community may offer valuable insights for other disease communities grappling with the same issues. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:211-216.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBiomarkersHumansIntermediate FilamentsNeurofilament ProteinsPrognosisSuperoxide Dismutase-1BiomarkersNeurofilament ProteinsSuperoxide Dismutase-1

Identifiers

PMID38110839
PMCPMC10842825
OpenAlexW4389934243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.