Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38110776›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Comparative outcomes of awake spine surgery under spinal versus general anesthesia: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rami Rajjoub, Abdul Karim Ghaith, Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Jorge Rios-Zermano, Gaetano De Biase, Elias Atallah, Ali Tfaily, Hassan Saad, Oluwaseun O Akinduro, Adrian Elmi-Terander and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rami RajjoubDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abdul Karim GhaithDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Victor Gabriel El-HajjDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jorge Rios-ZermanoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Gaetano De BiaseDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Elias AtallahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.
Ali TfailyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hassan SaadDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Oluwaseun O AkinduroDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Adrian Elmi-TeranderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-6136
Kingsley Abode-IyamahDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. abode-iyamah.kingsley@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USWinnMed · USEmory University · USJacksonville College · USKarolinska Institutet · SEThomas Jefferson University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwake surgery, under spinal anesthesia (SA), is an alternative to surgery under general anesthesia (GA), in neurological and spine surgery. In the literature, there seem to be some evidence supporting benefits associated with the use of this anesthetic modality, as compared to GA. Currently, there is a notable lack of updated and comprehensive review addressing the complications associated with both awake SA and GA in spine surgery. We hence aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the topic.

methodsA systematic search was conducted to identify studies that assessed SA in spine surgery from database inception to April 14, 2023, in PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Outcomes of interest included estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, operative time, and overall complications. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models.

resultsIn total, 38 studies that assessed 7820 patients were included. The majority of the operations that were treated with SA were single-level lumbar cases. Awake patients had significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay (Mean difference (MD): - 0.40 days; 95% CI - 0.64 to - 0.17) and operative time (MD: - 19.17 min; 95% CI - 29.68 to - 8.65) compared to patients under GA. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in patients under GA than SA (RR, 0.59 [95% CI 0.47-0.74]). Patients under GA had significantly higher rates of postoperative nausea/vomiting RR, 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.90]) and urinary retention (RR, 0.61 [95% CI 0.37-0.99]).

conclusionsPatients undergoing awake spine surgery under SA had significantly shorter operations and hospital stays, and fewer rates of postoperative nausea and urinary retention as compared to GA. In summary, awake spine surgery offers a valid alternative to GA and added benefits in terms of postsurgical complications, while being associated with relatively low morbidity.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, SpinalHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsSpineTreatment OutcomeWakefulnessAwakeComplicationsGeneral anesthesiaSpinal anesthesiaSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID38110776
OpenAlexW4389954726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.