ArticleScientific reports2023
A nomogram model for predicting 5-year risk of prediabetes in Chinese adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early effective intervention can significantly reduce all-cause mortality in prediabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on high-quality clinical studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Development of a biochemical model for identifying prediabetes in Chinese adults: a case-control study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Article
- External validation and application of a machine learning-based model for diabetes progression in prediabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of a nomogram to predict 1-year mortality risk in patients with HIV/AIDS undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.Renal failure · 2025Article
- Optimizing Feature Selection and Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Prediabetes Risk: Comparative Study.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prediabetes: A Scoping Review.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Development of a 5-Year Risk Prediction Model for Transition From Prediabetes to Diabetes Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Concentric-object and equiangular-object methods to perform standardized regional analysis in renal mpMRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Construction of a clinical predictive model for risk factors after laparoscopic surgery in patients with endometriosis based on pathologic characteristics.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Analysis of risk factors for delayed intracranial hemorrhage following ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery and construction of a nomogram model.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- U-shaped relationship between the triglyceride glucose index and the risk of incident diabetes among MASLD adults: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Non-linear connection between the triglyceride-glucose index and prediabetes risk among Chinese adults: a secondary retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Identifying Prediabetes and Diabetes in Normoglycemia.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2024Article
- Construction of a 3-year risk prediction model for developing diabetes in patients with pre-diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early identification is crucial to effectively intervene in individuals at high risk of developing pre-diabetes. This study aimed to create a personalized nomogram to determine the 5-year risk of pre-diabetes among Chinese adults. This retrospective cohort study included 184,188 participants without prediabetes at baseline. Training cohorts (92,177) and validation cohorts (92,011) were randomly assigned (92,011). We compared five prediction models on the training cohorts: full cox proportional hazards model, stepwise cox proportional hazards model, multivariable fractional polynomials (MFP), machine learning, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) models. At the same time, we validated the above five models on the validation set. And we chose the LASSO model as the final risk prediction model for prediabetes. We presented the model with a nomogram. The model's performance was evaluated in terms of its discriminative ability, clinical utility, and calibration using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, decision curve analysis, and calibration analysis on the training cohorts. Simultaneously, we also evaluated the above nomogram on the validation set. The 5-year incidence of prediabetes was 10.70% and 10.69% in the training and validation cohort, respectively. We developed a simple nomogram that predicted the risk of prediabetes by using the parameters of age, body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FBG), triglycerides (TG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and serum creatinine (Scr). The nomogram's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.7341 (95% CI 0.7290-0.7392) for the training cohort and 0.7336 (95% CI 0.7285-0.7387) for the validation cohort, indicating good discriminative ability. The calibration curve showed a perfect fit between the predicted prediabetes risk and the observed prediabetes risk. An analysis of the decision curve presented the clinical application of the nomogram, with alternative threshold probability spectrums being presented as well. A personalized prediabetes prediction nomogram was developed and validated among Chinese adults, identifying high-risk individuals. Doctors and others can easily and efficiently use our prediabetes prediction model when assessing prediabetes risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.