Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38110653›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2024

Comparative Effectiveness of Teclistamab Versus Real-World Physician's Choice of Therapy in LocoMMotion and MoMMent in Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Philippe Moreau, María-Victoria Mateos, Maria Esther Gonzalez Garcia, Hermann Einsele, Valerio De Stefano, Lionel Karlin, Joanne Lindsey-Hill, Britta Besemer, Laure Vincent, Suriya Kirkpatrick and 19 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03145181 phase1active not recruitingnot on this map

64007957MMY1001: A Phase 1/2, First-in-Human, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study of Teclistamab, a Humanized BCMA x CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2017 to 2027Enrolled302ConditionsHematological MalignanciesArmsTeclistamab (IV), Teclistamab(SC)
NCT04035226 completednot on this map

A Prospective, Multinational Study of Real-life Current Standards of Care in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received at Least 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Including PI, IMID, and CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorJanssen-Cilag Ltd.Ran2019 to 2022Enrolled254ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsNo intervention
NCT04557098 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

TECLIMMY1001-P3: A Phase 1/2, First-in-Human, Open-Label, Dose Escalation Study of Teclistamab, a Humanized BCMA x CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Subjects With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2020 to 2027Enrolled194ConditionsHematological MalignanciesArmsTeclistamab
NCT05160584 recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective, Multinational Study of Real-Life Current Standards of Care in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeobservationalSponsorJanssen Pharmaceutica N.V., BelgiumRan2021 to 2028Enrolled300ConditionsRelapsed/Refractory Multiple MyelomaArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. T-Cell Engagers TargetingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 20 institutions in 8 countries.

Philippe MoreauHematology Clinic, University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
María-Victoria MateosUniversity Hospital of Salamanca/IBSAL/CIC/CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain.
Maria Esther Gonzalez GarciaUniversity Hospital Cabueñes, Gijón, Spain.
Hermann EinseleMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Valerio De StefanoSection of Hematology, Catholic University, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Lionel KarlinCentre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Joanne Lindsey-HillNottinghamshire University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Britta BesemerUniversity of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Laure VincentCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Suriya KirkpatrickUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, England, UK.
Michel DelforgeUniversity of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Aurore PerrotCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Niels W C J van de DonkAmsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte PawlynThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Salomon ManierCHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Xavier LeleuCHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Joaquin Martinez-LopezHematología Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Francesca GhilottiJanssen-Cilag SpA, Cologno Monzese, Italy.
Joris DielsJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Raúl MoranoJanssen-Cilag, Madrid, Spain.
Claire AlbrechtJanssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Vadim StrulevJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, Belgium.
Imène HaddadJanssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Lixia PeiJanssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Rachel KobosJanssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Jennifer SmitJanssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA.
Mary SlavcevJanssen Global Services, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Alexander MarshallJanssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Katja WeiselUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. k.weisel@uke.de.
Janssen (United States) · USJanssen (Belgium) · BEJanssen (France) · FRAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRHôpital Lyon Sud · FRHospital Universitario De Cabueñes · ESHôtel-Dieu de Paris · FRInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESJanssen (Italy) · ITKU Leuven · BENottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversité de Lille · FRUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTeclistamab is the first approved B cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody with precision dosing for the treatment of triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We compared the effectiveness of teclistamab in MajesTEC-1 versus real-world physician's choice of therapy (RWPC) in patients from the prospective, non-interventional LocoMMotion and MoMMent studies.

methodsPatients treated with teclistamab from MajesTEC-1 (N = 165) were compared with an external control arm from LocoMMotion (N = 248) or LocoMMotion + MoMMent pooled (N = 302). Inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for imbalances in prognostic baseline characteristics. The relative effect of teclistamab versus RWPC for overall response rate (ORR), very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR) rate, and complete response or better (≥ CR) rate was estimated with an odds ratio using weighted logistic regression transformed into a response-rate ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Weighted proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

resultsBaseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment cohorts after reweighting. Patients treated with teclistamab had significantly improved outcomes versus RWPC in LocoMMotion: ORR (RR [95% CI], 2.44 [1.79-3.33]; p < 0.0001), ≥ VGPR (RR 5.78 [3.74-8.93]; p < 0.0001), ≥ CR (RR 113.73 [15.68-825.13]; p < 0.0001), DOR (HR 0.39 [0.24-0.64]; p = 0.0002), PFS (HR 0.48 [0.35-0.64]; p < 0.0001), and OS (HR 0.64 [0.46-0.88]; p = 0.0055). Teclistamab versus RWPC in LocoMMotion + MoMMent also had significantly improved outcomes: ORR (RR 2.41 [1.80-3.23]; p < 0.0001), ≥ VGPR (RR 5.91 [3.93-8.88]; p < 0.0001), ≥ CR (RR 132.32 [19.06-918.47]; p < 0.0001), DOR (HR 0.43 [0.26-0.71]; p = 0.0011), PFS (HR 0.49 [0.37-0.66]; p < 0.0001), and OS (HR 0.69 [0.50-0.95]; p = 0.0247).

conclusionTeclistamab demonstrated significantly improved effectiveness over RWPC in LocoMMotion ± MoMMent, emphasizing its clinical benefit as a highly effective treatment for patients with TCE RRMM.

trial registrationMajesTEC-1, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03145181 (phase 1) and NCT04557098 (phase 2); LocoMMotion, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04035226; MoMMent, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05160584.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsMultiple MyelomaPhysiciansAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsComparative Effectiveness ResearchHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsLocoMMotionMajesTEC-1MoMMentRelapsed or refractory multiple myelomaTeclistamabTriple-class exposed

Identifiers

PMID38110653
PMCPMC10838813
OpenAlexW4389902541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.