ReviewNano convergence2023
Filament-free memristors for computing.
Review in Nano convergence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking stable intermediate states in SrFeONature communications · 2026Article
- Area-Dependent Resistive Switching and Interfacial Dynamics in GCMO-Based Memristors.ACS applied electronic materials · 2025Article
- Memristive Ion Dynamics to Enable Biorealistic Computing.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- Enhanced performance of hafnia self-rectifying ferroelectric tunnel junctions at cryogenic temperatures.Nano convergence · 2024Article
- An elementary review on basic principles and developments of qubits for quantum computing.Nano convergence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memristors have attracted increasing attention due to their tremendous potential to accelerate data-centric computing systems. The dynamic reconfiguration of memristive devices in response to external electrical stimuli can provide highly desirable novel functionalities for computing applications when compared with conventional complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS)-based devices. Those most intensively studied and extensively reviewed memristors in the literature so far have been filamentary type memristors, which typically exhibit a relatively large variability from device to device and from switching cycle to cycle. On the other hand, filament-free switching memristors have shown a better uniformity and attractive dynamical properties, which can enable a variety of new computing paradigms but have rarely been reviewed. In this article, a wide range of filament-free switching memristors and their corresponding computing applications are reviewed. Various junction structures, switching properties, and switching principles of filament-free memristors are surveyed and discussed. Furthermore, we introduce recent advances in different computing schemes and their demonstrations based on non-filamentary memristors. This Review aims to present valuable insights and guidelines regarding the key computational primitives and implementations enabled by these filament-free switching memristors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.