ArticleBMJ open2023
Cohort study to characterise surgical site infections after open surgery in the UK's National Health Service.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Ultraviolet-C Inactivation ofMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Implementation of an SSI care bundle for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.Infection prevention in practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- The impact of smartphone-based monitoring on reducing National Health Service visits for cardiothoracic patients with surgical site infections.Infection prevention in practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the Diagnostic and Predictive Significance of Postoperative C-Reactive Protein to Transferrin or Albumin Ratio in Identifying Septic Events Following Major Abdominal Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Environmental and financial cost of surgical-site infection by severity after lower limb vascular surgery.BJS open · 2025Observational
- Article
- ASSIST: Development of a Simplified Clinician-Patient Hybrid Reporting Outcome Measure for Remote Diagnosis of Surgical Site Infection.International wound journal · 2025Article
- From Guidelines to Action: Tackling Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Impact of a multifaceted intervention including a smart reminder system for intraoperative antibiotic re-dosing on surgical site infections in a Chinese tertiary care hospital.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Surgical site infection in severe trauma patients in intensive care: epidemiology and risk factors.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infections among Patients in Referral Hospitals in Rwanda.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2024Article
- Nationwide Burden and Hospital Costs of Surgical Site Complications in France: A Retrospective Analysis of the French National PMSI Administrative Database.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo characterise surgical site infections (SSIs) after open surgery in the UK's National Health Service.
designRetrospective cohort analysis of electronic records of patients from Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked with Hospital Episode Statistics' secondary care datasets.
settingClinical practice in the community and secondary care.
participantsCohort of 50 000 adult patients who underwent open surgery between 2017 and 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of SSI, clinical outcomes, patterns of care and costs of wound management.
results11% (5281/50 000) of patients developed an SSI a mean of 18.4±14.7 days after their surgical procedure, of which 15% (806/5281) were inpatients and 85% (4475/5281) were in the community after hospital discharge. The incidence of SSI varied according to anatomical site of surgery. The incidence also varied according to a patient's risk and whether they underwent an emergency procedure. SSI onset reduced the 6 months healing rate by a mean of 3 percentage points and increased time to wound healing by a mean of 15 days per wound. SSIs were predominantly managed in the community by practice and district nurses and 16% (850/5281) of all patients were readmitted into hospital. The total health service cost of surgical wound management following SSI onset was a mean of £3537 per wound ranging from £2542 for a low-risk patient who underwent an elective procedure to £4855 for a high-risk patient who underwent an emergency procedure.
conclusionsThis study provides important insights into several aspects of SSI management in clinical practice in the UK that have been difficult to ascertain from surveillance data. Surgeons are unlikely to be fully aware of the true incidence of SSI and how they are managed once patients are discharged from hospital. Current SSI surveillance services appear to be under-reporting the actual incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.