ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2024
High Dosage Omega-3 Fatty Acids Outperform Existing Pharmacological Options for Migraine Prophylaxis: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nutritional supplements for migraine prevention: evaluating evidence sufficiency and effect modifiers through network meta-analysis, trial sequential analysis, and meta-regression.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- The Optimal Dosage and Duration of ω-3 PUFA Supplementation in Heart Failure Management: Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Pooled it
- Oral preventive medications for migraine in adults aged 18-65: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Role of memantine in adult migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare memantine with existing migraine preventive medications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- A High Omega-3, Low Omega-6 Diet Reduces Headache Frequency and Intensity in Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache: A Randomized Trial.Journal of neurotrauma · 2025Trial
- The relationship between triglyceride levels and medication overuse headache in patients with chronic migraine.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Cluster Analysis of Global Research Hotspots and Thematic Evolution in Chronic Migraine: A Bibliometric Study (1917-2024).Pain research & management · 2026Article
- Nutrition and Physical Activity in an Interdisciplinary Approach to Migraine: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Serum Resolvin D1 and Maresin 1 Levels During Migraine Attacks and the Interictal Period: A Paired Analysis in Emergency Department Patients.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Food in Migraine Management: Dietary Interventions in the Pathophysiology and Prevention of Headaches-A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Big data for neuroscience in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.The EPMA journal · 2025Review
- Long-chain PUFA and painful temporomandibular disorder in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.Public health nutrition · 2025Article
- Context-Dependent Roles of Four Classes of Bioactive Lipids in Neuroglia-Mediated Regulation of Neuroinflammation.Journal of pain research · 2025Review
- Comparison of Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids bioavailability in fish oil and krill oil: Network Meta-analyses.Food chemistry: X · 2024Article
- Neuroimmunological effects of omega-3 fatty acids on migraine: a review.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
- Effects of long-term daily supplementation with vitamin D3 and marine omega-3 fatty acids on change in ADRD biomarkers: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine is a highly prevalent neurologic disorder with prevalence rates ranging from 9% to 18% worldwide. Current pharmacologic prophylactic strategies for migraine have limited efficacy and acceptability, with relatively low response rates of 40% to 50% and limited safety profiles. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are considered promising therapeutic agents for migraine prophylaxis. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of various dosages of EPA/DHA and other current Food and Drug Administration-approved or guideline-recommended prophylactic pharmacologic interventions for migraine. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion if they enrolled participants with a diagnosis of either episodic or chronic migraine. All NMA procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. The primary outcomes assessed were 1) changes in migraine frequency and 2) acceptability (i.e., dropout for any reason). Secondary outcomes included response rates, changes in migraine severity, changes in the frequency of using rescue medications, and frequency of any adverse events. Forty RCTs were included (N = 6616; mean age = 35.0 y; 78.9% women). Our analysis showed that supplementation with high dosage EPA/DHA yields the highest decrease in migraine frequency [standardized mean difference (SMD): -1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.32, -0.39 compared with placebo] and the largest decrease in migraine severity (SMD: -2.23; 95% CI: -3.17, -1.30 compared with placebo) in all studied interventions. Furthermore, supplementation with high dosage EPA/DHA showed the most favorable acceptability rates (odds ratio: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.06, 17.41 compared with placebo) of all examined prophylactic treatments. This study provides compelling evidence that high dosage EPA/DHA supplementation can be considered a first-choice treatment of migraine prophylaxis because this treatment displayed the highest efficacy and highest acceptability of all studied treatments. This study was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42022319577.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.