Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38109935›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024

Genomic Tools in Biological Invasions: Current State and Future Frontiers.

Angela McGaughran, Manpreet K Dhami, Elahe Parvizi, Amy L Vaughan, Dianne M Gleeson, Kathryn A Hodgins, Lee A Rollins, Carolyn K Tepolt, Kathryn G Turner, Kamolphat Atsawawaranunt and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genomic investigations of successful invasions: the picture emerging from recent studies.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. First draft genome of the decaploid species,GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2026
    Article
  7. Improved Bayesian inference of hybrids using genome sequences.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Genome assembly and insights into globally invasive Red-vented Bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer).DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Population Genomic Insights Into Recent Nutria (Evolutionary applications · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The genome of the vining fernProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Eastern Fox Squirrel (Journal of mammalogy · 2025
    Article
  20. The origin, invasion history and resistance architecture ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Angela McGaughranTe Aka Mātuatua/School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-8699
Manpreet K DhamiBiocontrol and Molecular Ecology, Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8956-0674
Elahe ParviziTe Aka Mātuatua/School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Amy L VaughanBiocontrol and Molecular Ecology, Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Dianne M GleesonCentre for Conservation Ecology and Genomics, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Kathryn A HodginsSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lee A RollinsEvolution and Ecology Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Carolyn K TepoltDepartment of Biology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA.
Kathryn G TurnerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-0301
Kamolphat AtsawawaranuntSchool of Biological Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau/University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Paul BattlaySchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Carlos CongrainsEntomology Section, Department of Plant and Environmental Protection Sciences, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
Angelica CrottiniCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão 4485-661, Portugal.
Tristan P W DennisDepartment of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Claudia LangeBiocontrol and Molecular Ecology, Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Xiaoyue P LiuDepartment of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Paige MathesonTe Aka Mātuatua/School of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Henry L NorthDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Iva PopovicSchool of the Environment, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6582-4236
Marc RiusCentre for Advanced Studies of Blanes (CEAB, CSIC), Accés a la Cala Sant Francesc, Blanes, Spain.
Anna W SantureSchool of Biological Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau/University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Katarina C StuartSchool of Biological Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau/University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hui Zhen TanSchool of Biological Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau/University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cui WangThe Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jonathan WilsonSchool of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities are accelerating rates of biological invasions and climate-driven range expansions globally, yet we understand little of how genomic processes facilitate the invasion process. Although most of the literature has focused on underlying phenotypic correlates of invasiveness, advances in genomic technologies are showing a strong link between genomic variation and invasion success. Here, we consider the ability of genomic tools and technologies to (i) inform mechanistic understanding of biological invasions and (ii) solve real-world issues in predicting and managing biological invasions. For both, we examine the current state of the field and discuss how genomics can be leveraged in the future. In addition, we make recommendations pertinent to broader research issues, such as data sovereignty, metadata standards, collaboration, and science communication best practices that will require concerted efforts from the global invasion genomics community.

Indexed as

GenomicsIntroduced SpeciesClimateHumansbiological invasioninvasion genomicsinvasive speciesmanagementpest

Identifiers

PMID38109935
PMCPMC10776249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.