Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38109775›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2024

Work Experience of Intensive Care Nurses during the Period of the Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.

Gonca Karataş Baran, Sevcan Atasoy, Taşkın Tepe, Şenay Tanrıöver

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Gonca Karataş BaranIntensive Care Clinic, Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Sevcan AtasoyTraining Nursing Department and Intensive Care Clinic, Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Taşkın TepeTraining Nursing Department and Intensive Care Clinic, Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Şenay TanrıöverAdministrative Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Ankara Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRUniversity of Health Science · KHZübeyde Hanim Maternity Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was conducted to describe the working experiences, feelings, and thoughts of nurses working in the intensive care unit (ICU) during the COVID-19 pandemic from their perspective. Empirical phenomenological approach, one of the qualitative study methods, was used to obtain detailed descriptions of the experiences of nurses working in the ICU during the COVID-19 outbreak in providing patient care. The research design is an in-depth interview technique. The Colaizzi method was used in the analysis of the interviews. The data obtained from the research were categorized in six main themes. These themes are as follows: backbone of the health system-nursing, professional achievements, difficulties encountered, support needs and expectations, changes in emotions, and private life. In the process of fighting the pandemic, ICU nurses undertook important responsibilities, quickly adapted to the crisis, and displayed a strong stance, thus carrying a huge burden within the healthcare system.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID38109775
PMCPMC10859815
OpenAlexW4389887738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.