Rickettsia typhi in Southern California: A Growing Flea-Borne Threat.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Typhus Group Rickettsiosis and the Dengue Diagnostic Paradox: Low Laboratory-Confirmed Dengue Amid the Americas' Largest Epidemic.Infectious disease reports · 2026
   Article
2. Outcomes of Hospitalized and Critically Ill Adults with Murine Typhus, Galveston, Texas, USA, 2019-2023.Emerging infectious diseases · 2026
   Review
3. Survey of Fleas and Ticks for Rickettsia rickettsii and Rickettsia typhi in the El Paso Community and Other Areas in Texas, New Mexico, and Ciudad Juarez, Mexico.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
   Article
4. Bilateral acute multifocal retinitis and retinal vasculitis secondary to Rickettsia typhi infection.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025
   Article
5. Mitogenomic architecture and phylogenetic placement ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Surveillance of Flea-Borne Typhus in California, 2011-2019.2024

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as