Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38109195›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Mouthparts of the bumblebee (

Rachel H Parkinson, Jennifer Scott, Anna L Dorling, Hannah Jones, Martha Haslam, Alex E McDermott-Roberts, Geraldine A Wright

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel H ParkinsonDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-3178
Jennifer ScottDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anna L DorlingDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0005-4084-0201
Hannah JonesDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-8094
Martha HaslamDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Alex E McDermott-RobertsDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Geraldine A WrightDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-021X
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S000402/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bees are important pollinators of agricultural crops, but their populations are at risk when pesticides are used. One of the largest risks bees face is poisoning of floral nectar and pollen by insecticides. Studies of bee detection of neonicotinoids have reported contradictory evidence about whether bees can taste these pesticides in sucrose solutions and hence avoid them. Here, we use an assay for the detection of food aversion combined with single-sensillum electrophysiology to test whether the mouthparts of the buff-tailed bumblebee (

Indexed as

InsecticidesPesticidesAnimalsBeesBiological AssayCrops, AgriculturalPlant NectarInsecticidesPesticidesPlant Nectaracetylcholinebeeecologygustationneonicotinoidneurosciencepesticidetaste

Identifiers

PMID38109195
PMCPMC10727498
OpenAlexW4386326159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.