Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38109170›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2023

Stakeholders' Perspectives, Needs, and Barriers to Self-Management for People With Physical Disabilities Experiencing Chronic Conditions: Focus Group Study.

Eric Evans, Ayse Zengul, Amy Knight, Amanda Willig, Andrea Cherrington, Tapan Mehta, Mohanraj Thirumalai

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05481593 (An Accessible and Inclusive Artificial Intelligence Assisted Chronic Disease Self-Management Telehealth Platform), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05481593 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

An Accessible and Inclusive Artificial Intelligence Assisted Chronic Disease Self-Management Telehealth Platform: A Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2024 to 2025Enrolled212ConditionsDisability Physical, Chronic Condition, Chronic Conditions, MultipleArmsScheduled Coaching + Gamified Rewards, Scheduled Coaching Calls + Independent Rewards, No Scheduled Coaching Calls + Gamified Rewards, No Scheduled Coaching Calls + Independent rewards
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric Evans *Department of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3751-0269
Ayse Zengul *Department of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2820-7076
Amy Knight *Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5069-1845
Amanda Willig *Department of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8802-4311
Andrea Cherrington *Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8321-3567
Tapan Mehta *Department of Family and Community Medicine, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2016-2344
Mohanraj Thirumalai *Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9768-3829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile self-management programs have had significant improvements for individuals with chronic conditions, less is known about the impact of self-management programs for individuals with physical disabilities who experience chronic conditions, as no holistic self-management programs exist for this population. Similarly, there is limited knowledge of how other stakeholders, such as caregivers, health experts, and researchers, view self-management programs in the context of disability, chronic health conditions, and assistive technologies.

objectiveThis study aimed to obtain insight into how stakeholders perceive self-management relating to physical disability, chronic conditions, and assistive technologies.

methodsNine focus groups were conducted by 2 trained facilitators using semistructured interview guides. Each guide contained questions relating to stakeholders' experiences, challenges with self-management programs, and perceptions of assistive technologies. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted on the focus group data.

resultsA total of 47 individuals participated in the focus groups. By using a constructivist grounded approach and inductive data collection, three main themes emerged from the focus groups: (1) perspectives, (2) needs, and (3) barriers of stakeholders. Stakeholders emphasized the importance of physical activity, mental health, symptom management, medication management, participant centeredness, and chronic disease and disability education. Participants viewed technology as a beneficial aide to their daily self-management and expressed their desire to have peer-to-peer support in web-based self-management programs. Additional views of technology included the ability to access individualized, educational content and connect with other individuals who experience similar health conditions or struggle with caregiving duties.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that the development of any web-based self-management program should include mental health education and resources in addition to physical activity content and symptom management and be cost-effective. Beyond the inclusion of educational resources, stakeholders desired customization or patient centeredness in the program to meet the overall needs of individuals with physical disabilities and caregivers. The development of web-based self-management programs should be holistic in meeting the needs of all stakeholders.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05481593; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05481593.

Indexed as

assistive technologiesassistive technologybarrierchronicchronic conditionchronic illnessdatadevelopmentdigitaldisabilityfocus groupinterviewmental healthneedperspectivephysical activityphysical disabilitiesphysical disabilityqualitativeself-managementsupportsymptomtechnology

Identifiers

PMID38109170
PMCPMC10758937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.