Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38108956›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2024

Medical and Mechanical Circulatory Support of the Failing Right Ventricle.

Eugene Yuriditsky, Meshe Chonde, Oren Friedman, James M Horowitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The latest in the management of pulmonary embolism.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eugene YuriditskyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 530 First Ave. Skirball 9R, New York, NY, 10016, USA. eugene.yuriditsky@nyulangone.org.
Meshe ChondeDepartment of Cardiology, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Oren FriedmanDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
James M HorowitzDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, 530 First Ave. Skirball 9R, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
NYU Langone Health · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo describe medical therapies and mechanical circulatory support devices used in the treatment of acute right ventricular failure. RECENT

findingsExperts have proposed several algorithms providing a stepwise approach to medical optimization of acute right ventricular failure including tailored volume administration, ideal vasopressor selection to support coronary perfusion, inotropes to restore contractility, and pulmonary vasodilators to improve afterload. Studies have investigated various percutaneous and surgically implanted right ventricular assist devices in several clinical settings. The initial management of acute right ventricular failure is often guided by invasive hemodynamic data tracking parameters of circulatory function with the use of pharmacologic therapies. Percutaneous microaxial and centrifugal extracorporeal pumps bypass the failing RV and support circulatory function in severe cases of right ventricular failure.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, RightHeart VentriclesHemodynamicsHumansPerfusionTreatment OutcomeAcute right ventricular failureMechanical circulatory supportRight ventricular assist device

Identifiers

PMID38108956
OpenAlexW4389895403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.