Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38108888›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Gadolinium-enhanced intracranial aneurysm wall imaging and risk of aneurysm growth and rupture: a multicentre longitudinal cohort study.

Laura T van der Kamp, Myriam Edjlali, Olivier Naggara, Toshinori Matsushige, Diederik O Bulters, Ronneil Digpal, Chengcheng Zhu, David Saloner, Peng Hu, Xiaodong Zhai and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Laura T van der KampDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, room number G3-201, Postbox 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands. L.T.vanderkamp@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0702-7199
Myriam EdjlaliDepartment of Radiology, APHP, Hôpitaux Raymond-Poincaré and Ambroise Paré, DMU Smart Imaging, Laboratoire d'imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale (BioMaps), GH Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, Orsay, France.
Olivier NaggaraDepartment of Neuroradiology, Université de Paris, IMABRAIN-INSERM-UMR1266, DHU-Neurovasc, GHU Paris, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Toshinori MatsushigeDepartment of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Diederik O BultersDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Ronneil DigpalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Chengcheng ZhuDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
David SalonerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Peng HuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Bejing, China.
Xiaodong ZhaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Capital Medical University Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Bejing, China.
Mahmud Mossa-BashaDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bing TianDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Shigeyuki SakamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery and Interventional Neuroradiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Qichang FuDepartment of Magnetic Resonance, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ynte M RuigrokDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, room number G3-201, Postbox 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands.
Huilin ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Huijun ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Bejing, China.
Gabriel J E RinkelDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, room number G3-201, Postbox 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands.
Irene C van der SchaafDepartment of Radiology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mervyn D I VergouwenDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, University Medical Center Utrecht, room number G3-201, Postbox 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands.

Funding

Hartstichting 2018T076Hartstichting CVON2015-08 ERASE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn patients with an unruptured intracranial aneurysm, gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall is associated with growth and rupture. However, most previous studies did not have a longitudinal design and did not adjust for aneurysm size, which is the main predictor of aneurysm instability and the most important determinant of wall enhancement. We investigated whether aneurysm wall enhancement predicts aneurysm growth and rupture during follow-up and whether the predictive value was independent of aneurysm size. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this multicentre longitudinal cohort study, individual patient data were obtained from twelve international cohorts. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 18 years or older with ≥ 1 untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm < 15 mm; gadolinium-enhanced aneurysm wall imaging and MRA at baseline; and MRA or rupture during follow-up. Patients were included between November 2012 and November 2019. We calculated crude hazard ratios with 95%CI of aneurysm wall enhancement for growth (≥ 1 mm increase) or rupture and adjusted for aneurysm size.

resultsIn 455 patients (mean age (SD), 60 (13) years; 323 (71%) women) with 559 aneurysms, growth or rupture occurred in 13/194 (6.7%) aneurysms with wall enhancement and in 9/365 (2.5%) aneurysms without enhancement (crude hazard ratio 3.1 [95%CI: 1.3-7.4], adjusted hazard ratio 1.4 [95%CI: 0.5-3.7]) with a median follow-up duration of 1.2 years.

conclusionsGadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall predicts aneurysm growth or rupture during short-term follow-up, but not independent of aneurysm size. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Gadolinium-enhanced aneurysm wall imaging is not recommended for short-term prediction of growth and rupture, since it appears to have no additional value to conventional predictors. KEY POINTS: • Although aneurysm wall enhancement is associated with aneurysm instability in cross-sectional studies, it remains unknown whether it predicts risk of aneurysm growth or rupture in longitudinal studies. • Gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall predicts aneurysm growth or rupture during short-term follow-up, but not when adjusting for aneurysm size. • While gadolinium-enhanced aneurysm wall imaging is not recommended for short-term prediction of growth and rupture, it may hold potential for aneurysms smaller than 7 mm.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedContrast MediaGadoliniumIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance AngiographyAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedContrast MediaGadoliniumBrainIntracranial aneurysmMagnetic resonance imagingRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID38108888
PMCPMC11213723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.