Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38108886›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2023

Molecular Characterisation of Faecal Bacterial Assemblages Among Four Species of Syntopic Odonates.

A Morrill, M R Forbes, E J Vesterinen, M Tamminen, I E Sääksjärvi, K M Kaunisto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. With a little help from my friends: the roles of microbial symbionts in insect populations and communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A MorrillDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
M R ForbesDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
E J VesterinenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
M TamminenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
I E SääksjärviBiodiversity Unit, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
K M KaunistoBiodiversity Unit, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. kari.kaunisto@utu.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors such as host species, phylogeny, diet, and both timing and location of sampling are thought to influence the composition of gut-associated bacteria in insects. In this study, we compared the faecal-associated bacterial taxa for three Coenagrion and one Enallagma damselfly species. We expected high overlap in representation of bacterial taxa due to the shared ecology and diet of these species. Using metabarcoding based on the 16S rRNA gene, we identified 1513 sequence variants, representing distinct bacterial 'taxa'. Intriguingly, the damselfly species showed somewhat different magnitudes of richness of ZOTUs, ranging from 480 to 914 ZOTUs. In total, 921 (or 60.8% of the 1513) distinct ZOTUs were non-shared, each found only in one species, and then most often in only a single individual. There was a surfeit of these non-shared incidental ZOTUs in the Enallagma species accounting for it showing the highest bacterial richness and accounting for a sample-wide pattern of more single-species ZOTUs than expected, based on comparisons to the null model. Future studies should address the extent to which faecal bacteria represent non-incidental gut bacteria and whether abundant and shared taxa are true gut symbionts. Pictures of odonates adopted from Norske Art databank under Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0).

Indexed as

BacteriaOdonataAnimalsEcologyFecesHost SpecificityRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial assemblagesBiodiversityDamselflyFaecal DNAMetabarcodingMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID38108886
PMCPMC10728244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.