Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38108412›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2023

Cryo-Electron Microscopy Screening Automation across Multiple Grids using Smart Leginon.

Anjelique Sawh-Gopal, Aygul Ishemgulova, Eugene Y D Chua, Mahira F Aragon, Joshua H Mendez, Edward T Eng, Alex J Noble

Open access · hybridAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anjelique Sawh-GopalSimons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center; Herbert Wertheim UF Scripps Institute for Biomedical Innovation & Technology.
Aygul Ishemgulova *Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center.
Eugene Y D Chua *Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center.
Mahira F Aragon *Simons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center.
Joshua H MendezSimons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center; jmendez@nysbc.org.
Edward T EngSimons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center; eeng@nysbc.org.
Alex J NobleSimons Electron Microscopy Center, New York Structural Biology Center; anoble@nysbc.org.
New York Structural Biology Center · USThe Herbert Wertheim UF Scripps Institute for Biomedical Innovation & Technology

Funding

NCCAT: National Center for CryoEM Access and Training- Supplement for Windows 10 and FFIU24GM129539 · NIGMS · NEW YORK STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY CENTER · PI DE MARCO, ALEX, KIEFT, JEFFREY S · 2018 to 2023
$53.9M
NCCAT: National Center for CryoEM Access and TrainingR24GM154192 · NIGMS · NEW YORK STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY CENTER · PI EDWARD T ENG, Jeffrey S Kieft · 2024 to 2026
$21.0M
TRD #3: An automated and streamlined pipeline for in-situ molecular microscopyP41GM103310 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI DE MARCO, ALEX, KIEFT, JEFFREY S · 2012 to 2021
$14.7M
The National Center for In-situ Tomographic Ultramicroscopy (NCITU) SupplementU24GM139171 · NIGMS · NEW YORK STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY CENTER · PI DE MARCO, ALEX, KIEFT, JEFFREY S · 2020 to 2025
$8.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103310NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM154192NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM129539NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM139171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) techniques over the past decade have allowed structural biologists to routinely resolve macromolecular protein complexes to near-atomic resolution. The general workflow of the entire cryoEM pipeline involves iterating between sample preparation, cryoEM grid preparation, and sample/grid screening before moving on to high-resolution data collection. Iterating between sample/grid preparation and screening is typically a major bottleneck for researchers, as every iterative experiment must optimize for sample concentration, buffer conditions, grid material, grid hole size, ice thickness, and protein particle behavior in the ice, amongst other variables. Furthermore, once these variables are satisfactorily determined, grids prepared under identical conditions vary widely in whether they are ready for data collection, so additional screening sessions prior to selecting optimal grids for high-resolution data collection are recommended. This sample/grid preparation and screening process often consumes several dozen grids and days of operator time at the microscope. Furthermore, the screening process is limited to operator/microscope availability and microscope accessibility. Here, we demonstrate how to use Leginon and Smart Leginon Autoscreen to automate the majority of cryoEM grid screening. Autoscreen combines machine learning, computer vision algorithms, and microscope-handling algorithms to remove the need for constant manual operator input. Autoscreen can autonomously load and image grids with multi-scale imaging using an automated specimen-exchange cassette system, resulting in unattended grid screening for an entire cassette. As a result, operator time for screening 12 grids may be reduced to ~10 min with Autoscreen compared to ~6 h using previous methods which are hampered by their inability to account for high variability between grids. This protocol first introduces basic Leginon setup and functionality, then demonstrates Autoscreen functionality step-by-step from the creation of a template session to the end of a 12-grid automated screening session.

Indexed as

Computer SystemsIceAlgorithmsAutomationCryoelectron MicroscopyIce

Identifiers

PMID38108412
PMCPMC11922482
OpenAlexW4389280548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.