Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38108348›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2024

The Reliability and Clinical Validation of Automatically-Derived Verbal Memory Features of the Verbal Learning Test in Early Diagnostics of Cognitive Impairment.

Nina Possemis, Daphne Ter Huurne, Leonie Banning, Angelique Gruters, Stephanie Van Asbroeck, Alexandra König, Nicklas Linz, Johannes Tröger, Kai Langel, Arjan Blokland and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. User Experience of a (Semi-) Automated Cognitive Phone-Based Assessment Within a Memory Clinic Population.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nina PossemisAlzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daphne Ter HuurneAlzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Leonie BanningMaastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Angelique GrutersCatharina Hospital, Medical Psychology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Stephanie Van AsbroeckAlzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alexandra KönigNational Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA), Valbonne, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Nicklas Linzki:elements, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Johannes Trögerki:elements, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Kai LangelJanssen Clinical Innovation, Beerse, Belgium.
Arjan BloklandFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Neuropsychology & Psychopharmacology, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jos PrickaertsSchool for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marjolein de VugtAlzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Frans VerheyAlzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Inez RamakersAlzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research has shown that verbal memory accurately measures cognitive decline in the early phases of neurocognitive impairment. Automatic speech recognition from the verbal learning task (VLT) can potentially be used to differentiate between people with and without cognitive impairment.

objectiveInvestigate whether automatic speech recognition (ASR) of the VLT is reliable and able to differentiate between subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

methodsThe VLT was recorded and processed via a mobile application. Following, verbal memory features were automatically extracted. The diagnostic performance of the automatically derived features was investigated by training machine learning classifiers to distinguish between participants with SCD versus MCI/dementia.

resultsThe ICC for inter-rater reliability between the clinical and automatically derived features was 0.87 for the total immediate recall and 0.94 for the delayed recall. The full model including the total immediate recall, delayed recall, recognition count, and the novel verbal memory features had an AUC of 0.79 for distinguishing between participants with SCD versus MCI/dementia. The ten best differentiating VLT features correlated low to moderate with other cognitive tests such as logical memory tasks, semantic verbal fluency, and executive functioning.

conclusionsThe VLT with automatically derived verbal memory features showed in general high agreement with the clinical scoring and distinguished well between SCD and MCI/dementia participants. This might be of added value in screening for cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionDementiaHumansMemoryMental RecallNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsVerbal LearningAlzheimer’s diseasecognitive dysfunctionmemoryspeech

Identifiers

PMID38108348
PMCPMC10789344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.