ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2024
What if an articular bone fragment drops on the floor in the course of osteosynthesis? An experimental study.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can contaminated musculoskeletal autografts and allografts Be safely and effectively used in Patients? A systematic review.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a 1-min 10% povidone-iodine immersion in the decontamination of dropped osteochondral fragments. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-eight sets of sterile osteochondral bone fragments, each consisting of three samples, were prepared from removed femoral heads that would otherwise be discarded during different hip replacement surgeries. Immediately afterward, each set was dropped on the floor right behind the surgeon in another operating room in which fracture fixation operations were being performed. Samples were picked up with sterile gloves. A swab culture of the floor was taken. One of the three pieces was kept as the control group. The second one (saline group) was washed with saline and subsequently soaked in saline for 1 min. The last one (treatment group) was first immersed in a 10% povidone-iodine solution for 1 min, then rinsed with saline and soaked in saline for 1 min. The samples were cultured in nutrient media, and microorganisms were identified at the microbiology laboratory. The groups were compared in terms of positive culture rates.
resultsThe positive culture (contamination) rates were 100%, 58.3%, 39.6%, and 10.4% for the swab samples, control group, saline group, and treatment group respectively. The decontamination ratio in the treatment group was significantly more than both the control group (p<0.001) and the saline group (p=0.001). Handling only with saline did not significantly decontaminate compared to the control group (p=0.066).
conclusionImmersing the dropped osteochondral fragments in 10% povidone-iodine solution for 1 min and then rinsing with saline may provide statistically significant decontamination but cannot be accepted to be safe enough for clinical practice. Further studies are needed to find the optimal time needed for safe decontamination without compromising the viability of cartilage tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.