Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38108140›Full record

ArticleComputer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering2025

Towards a radiation free numerical modelling framework to predict spring assisted correction of scaphocephaly.

Begona Garate Andikoetxea, Sara Ajami, Naiara Rodriguez-Florez, N U Owase Jeelani, David Dunaway, Silvia Schievano, Alessandro Borghi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Begona Garate AndikoetxeaUniversity College London, United Kingdom.
Sara AjamiUniversity College London, United Kingdom.
Naiara Rodriguez-FlorezUniversidad de Navarra, Spain.
N U Owase JeelaniGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
David DunawayGreat Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Silvia SchievanoUniversity College London, United Kingdom.
Alessandro BorghiUniversity College London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBIkerbasque · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sagittal Craniosynostosis (SC) is a congenital craniofacial malformation, involving premature sagittal suture ossification; spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) - insertion of metallic distractors for skull reshaping - is an established method for treating SC. Surgical outcomes are predictable using numerical modelling, however published methods rely on computed tomography (CT) scans availability, which are not routinely performed. We investigated a simplified method, based on radiation-free 3D stereophotogrammetry scans. Eight SAC patients (age 5.1 ± 0.4 months) with preoperative CT and 3D stereophotogrammetry scans were included. Information on osteotomies, spring model and post-operative spring opening were recorded. For each patient, two preoperative models (PREOP) were created: i) CT model and ii) S model, created by processing patient specific 3D surface scans using population averaged skin and skull thickness and suture locations. Each model was imported into ANSYS Mechanical (Analysis System Inc., Canonsburg, PA) to simulate spring expansion. Spring expansion and cranial index (CI - skull width over length) at times equivalent to immediate postop (POSTOP) and follow up (FU) were extracted and compared with in-vivo measurements. Overall expansion patterns were very similar for the 2 models at both POSTOP and FU. Both models had comparable outcomes when predicting spring expansion. Spring induced CI increase was similar, with a difference of 1.2%±0.8% for POSTOP and 1.6%±0.6% for FU. This work shows that a simplified model created from the head surface shape yields acceptable results in terms of spring expansion prediction. Further modelling refinements will allow the use of this predictive tool during preoperative planning.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantMaleSkullTomography, X-Ray ComputedcraniosynostosisFinite element modellingspring cranioplasty

Identifiers

PMID38108140
PMCPMC11854028
OpenAlexW4389899961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.