Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107855›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Comparing the genetic typing methods for effective surveillance and rabies control in Georgia.

Rene E Condori, Natia Kartskhia, Lasha Avaliani, Marina Donduashvili, Tinatin Elbakidze, Ana Kapanadze, Emily G Pieracci, Giorgi Maghlakelidze, Ashutosh Wadhwa, Clint N Morgan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rene E CondoriPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Natia KartskhiaVeterinary Department, National Food Agency, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Lasha AvalianiVeterinary Department, National Food Agency, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Marina DonduashviliState Laboratory of Agriculture, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Tinatin ElbakidzeState Laboratory of Agriculture, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ana KapanadzeState Laboratory of Agriculture, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Emily G PieracciPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Giorgi MaghlakelidzeCenter for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Ashutosh WadhwaPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Clint N MorganPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Mary ReynoldsPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Yu LiPoxvirus and Rabies Branch, Division of High Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Disease, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Lena NinidzeVeterinary Department, National Food Agency, Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USMinistry of Environment Protection and Agriculture of Georgia · GENational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · USNational Environmental Agency · GENational Center for Disease Control and Public Health · GE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A full nucleoprotein gene sequencing of 68 isolates collected from passive rabies surveillance system in Georgia between 2015 and 2016 identified two distinct dog rabies phylogroups, GEO_V1 and GEO_V2, which both belonged to the cosmopolitan dog clade. GEO_V1 was found throughout the country and was further divided into four sub-phylogroups that overlapped geographically; GEO_V2 was found in the southeast region and was closely related to dog rabies in Azerbaijan. A sequence analysis of the full N gene, partial nucleoprotein gene of N-terminal and C-terminal, and the amplicon sequences of pan-lyssavirus RT-qPCR LN34 showed that all four sequencing approaches provided clear genetic typing results of canine rabies and could further differentiate GEO_V1 and GEO_V2. The phylogenetic analysis results vary and were affected by the length of the sequences used. Amplicon sequencing of the LN34 assay positive samples provided a rapid and cost-effective method for rabies genetic typing, which is important for improving rabies surveillance and canine rabies eradication globally.

Indexed as

canine rabiesgenetic diversityLN34 assaymolecular epidemiologyrabies typingsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID38107855
PMCPMC10722154
OpenAlexW4389236465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.