Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107812›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2023

A Review of Various Clinical Practice Guidelines on Osteoporosis in the Last 5 Years.

Murali Poduval, Srinivas B S Kambhampati, Karthik Vishwanathan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Murali PoduvalLifesciences Engineering, Tata Consultancy Services, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6821-0640
Srinivas B S KambhampatiSri Dhaatri, 23, Lane 2, SKDGOC, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 520008 India.
Karthik VishwanathanDepartment of Orthopedics, Parul Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat India.
Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences · INParul University · INTata Consultancy Services (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Osteoporosis, also called the silent disease, affects the elderly with a significant contribution to their morbidity and mortality through fragility fractures. Most nations have developed their own guidelines on managing this condition. Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are the highest quality evidence documents on a particular topic prepared by expert panels. CPGs offer standardised recommendations on a particular topic. Methods: We looked at the CPGs of nations in the last five years and present the results of this review here. This review is divided into Risk assessment, prevention, diagnosis, Non pharmacological and pharmacological management with information from major CPGs only. Results: Most CPGs agree on the broad principles of assessment , core risk factors, prevention and management with some finer differences in subtle aspects of assessment and management. There are differences in the use of screening tools based on the population numbers and affordability between nations. FRAX has been advocated for the screening with or without DEXA. Most CPGs use DEXA for confirmation of diagnosis. Intervention is based on FRAX scoring. Intervention thresholds vary. We discuss non-pharmacological management included diet and nutrition, calcium and Vitamin D, Exercise and physiotherapy, lifestyle changes and falls prevention. Pharmacological management included aspects of using different medications and their indications. The key agents recommended include Bisphosphonates, Teriparatide, Denosumab, SERMs, Hormone Replacement Therapy, and other agents including any drug holidays and duration of therapy. Conclusions: This review identified some key recommendations from CPGs from multiple nations in each of the above given aspects of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Clinical practice guidelinesOsteopeniaOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID38107812
PMCPMC10721745
OpenAlexW4388844173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.