ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2023
Inhalation-modulated detection of olfactory BOLD responses in the human brain.
Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discrimination of Pairs of Chemosensory Stimuli in Relation to Respiration.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Gamma and beta oscillatory signatures of the human olfactory bulb encode odor valence and sampling.iScience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In contrast to other sensory domains, detection of primary olfactory processes using functional magnetic resonance imaging has proven to be notably challenging with conventional block designs. This difficulty arises from significant habituation and hemodynamic responses in olfactory areas that do not appear to align with extended boxcar functions convolved with a generic hemodynamic response model. Consequently, some researchers have advocated for a transition to event-related designs, despite their known lower detection power compared to block designs. Methods: Here, we conducted a block design experiment with 16s of continuous odorant stimulation alternating with 16s of continuous odorless air stimulation in 33 healthy participants. We compared four statistical analyses that relied either on standard block designs (SBD1-2) or on block designs that were modulated by the participants' individual breathing patterns (MBD1-2). Results: We found that such modulated block designs were comparatively more powerful than standard block designs, despite having a substantially lower design efficiency. Using whole-brain effect size maps, we observed that the right insular and medial aspects of the left piriform cortex exhibited a preference for a breathing-modulated analysis approach. Discussion: Research in olfaction that necessitates designs with longer-lasting blocks, such as those employed in the investigation of state-dependent processing, will benefit from the breathing-modulated analyses outlined in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.