Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107760›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pain2023

Restorative neurostimulation for chronic mechanical low back pain - Three year results from the United Kingdom post market clinical follow-up registry.

Simon Thomson, Adam Williams, Girish Vajramani, Manohar Sharma, Sarah Love-Jones, Rajiv Chawla, Sam Eldabe

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01985230 (Investigation of the ReActiv8 Implantable Stimulation System for Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01985230 nacompletednot on this map

Investigation of the ReActiv8 Implantable Stimulation System for Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMainstay MedicalRan2014 to 2024Enrolled96ConditionsChronic Low Back PainArmsReActiv8 Implantable Stimulation System implanted and activated.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ultrasound estimated connective tissue proportion is lower after 6 months of restorative neurostimulation therapy: an exploratory analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Restorative neurostimulation of the lumbar multifidus muscles improves mobility, strength, pain and disability in patients with mechanical chronic low back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Real-world two-year durability of restorative neurostimulation for treatment of multifidus dysfunction in patients with chronic low back pain: an observational German cohort study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lumbar Facet Joint Disease: What, Why, and When?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Simon ThomsonSimon Thomson, Mid and South Essex University NHSFT, Pain and Neuromodulation Orsett Hospital, Essex, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3027-9343
Adam WilliamsNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK.
Girish VajramaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Manohar SharmaThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sarah Love-JonesNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK.
Rajiv ChawlaThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation TrustLiverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Sam EldabeDepartment of Pain Medicine, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
North Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBJames Cook University Hospital · GBOrsett Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Mechanical chronic low back pain is often associated with impaired neuromuscular control of the lumbar multifidus muscles, the most important stabilizers of the lumbar spine. Restorative neurostimulation is a modality for the treatment for this specific subset of patients aimed to facilitate restoration of neuromuscular control by bilateral stimulation of the L2 medial branches. Evidence from both prospective and randomised clinical trials to date has demonstrated substantial improvements in clinical outcomes such as pain, disability and health-related quality of life. Methods: This study is an open label prospective follow-up for the treatment of chronic mechanical low back pain of nociceptive origin with restorative neurostimulation. Patients completed assessments for pain, disability and health-related quality of life. Outcomes were collected at 45, 90 and 180 days, and 1, 2 and 3 years after the activation visit. Results: Forty-two patients were implanted with the device and 33 (79%) were available at the 3-year appointment. Patients in this cohort presented with severe chronic low back pain (NRS = 7.0 ± 0.2) and severe disability (ODI 46.6 ± 12.0). The health-related quality of life was also severely impacted at baseline (EQ-5D 0.426 ± 0.061). Changes in pain, disability and quality of life at three-year follow-up demonstrated a statistically significant improvement between baseline and 1, 2 and 3 years. After 3 years of therapy, average NRS scores had reduced to 2.7± 0.3 and mean ODI score to 26.0 ± 3.1 while EQ-5D-5L index improved to 0.707 ± 0.036. Conclusions: The ongoing follow-up of this post market cohort continues to demonstrate that restorative neurostimulation provides a statistically significant, clinically meaningful and durable response across pain, disability and quality-of life scores for patients suffering chronic mechanical low back pain that has been refractory to conventional management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01985230.

Indexed as

Low back painmotor controlmultifidusnociceptive painperipheral nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38107760
PMCPMC10722104
OpenAlexW4379519387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.