Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107751›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Psychology2022

Revisiting the theoretical and methodological foundations of depression measurement.

Eiko I Fried, Jessica K Flake, Donald J Robinaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Contra-Hedonic Functions of Self-Destructive Behaviors in Adolescents.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Targeting mechanisms of change as a path to precision psychotherapy for community settings.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Decisional reference point pathology: A cognitive mechanism for and a correlate of major depressive disorder in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eiko I FriedDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jessica K FlakeDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Donald J RobinaughDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, US.

Funding

Network Psychiatry: Using Network Science to Advance Our Understanding of Post-Bereavement PsychopathologyK23MH113805 · NIMH · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBINAUGH, DONALD JOHN · 2018 to 2022
$988k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH113805
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depressive disorders are among the leading causes of global disease burden, but there has been limited progress in understanding the causes and treatments for these disorders. In this Perspective, we suggest that such progress crucially depends on our ability to measure depression. We review the many problems with depression measurement, including limited evidence of validity and reliability. These issues raise grave concerns about common uses of depression measures, such as diagnosis or tracking treatment progress. We argue that shortcomings arise because depression measurement rests on shaky methodological and theoretical foundations. Moving forward, we need to break with the field's tradition that has, for decades, divorced theories about depression from how we measure it. Instead, we suggest that epistemic iteration, an iterative exchange between theory and measurement, provides a crucial avenue for depression measurement to progress.

Identifiers

PMID38107751
PMCPMC10723193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.