ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2023
The risk of developing motor complications with Levodopa immediate versus dual release upon treatment initiation in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Motor complications (MCs) compromise therapy in many patients suffering from Parkinson's Disease. By achieving more physiologic stimulation of dopamine-receptors, the continuous dopamine stimulation hypothesis suggests that longer-acting levodopa formulations may improve outcome. The aim of this study was to compare the duration until onset of MCs and motor disease progression in patients during their treatment initiation with either an immediate (IR) or a combined rapid- and sustained-release (i.e. dual-release; DR) levodopa formulation. Methods: Using a sample of 69 patients, we applied time-varying survival regression analyses and linear mixed effect models to analyze the data. The latter involved preprocessing of the data to temporally align the response and predictors, including analyzing the extent of visit irregularity and potential predictors of visit intensity. Results: This retrospective study suggests that levodopa-benserazide DR is not superior to levodopa-benserazide IR in affecting duration until MCs and disease progression. Conversely, using DR levodopa-benserazide, similar disease progression was achieved with lower and more constant doses. Conclusions: The effects of DR levodopa-benserazide might not be strong enough to delay onset of MCs. The development of more powerful levodopa formulations remains a pressing clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.