ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Static and dynamic functional connectivity combined with the triple network model in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disruptive resting state networks characterizing depressive comorbidity in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Pooled it
- Dynamic functional connectivity variability may explain hypoxia-induced cognitive impairment at high-altitude.iScience · 2026Article
- Longitudinal alterations in static and dynamic functional connectivity in basal ganglia ischaemic stroke: implications for neurological recovery.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Whole-Brain Static Functional Connectivity Disruptions Based on the Default Mode Network in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Brain Network Patterns in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy: Spatial Independent Component Analysis Using FDG-PET Data.Neurology · 2026Article
- Dynamic functional connectivity changes in the triple networks in patients with mitochondrial encephalomyopathy with lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study on cerebrovascular reactivity changes in the precuneus of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Resting-State Functional MRI Reveals Altered Seed-Based Connectivity in Diabetic Osteoporosis Patients.Clinical interventions in aging · 2025Article
- Brain structural changes in diabetic retinopathy patients: a combined voxel-based morphometry and surface-based morphometry study.Brain imaging and behavior · 2024Article
- Exploring causal links between brain functional networks and neurodegenerative disease risk using Mendelian randomization.Journal of Alzheimer's disease reportsArticle
- Resting-state fMRI in women with functional constipation with or without stress urinary incontinence.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) are characterized by abnormal functional connectivity (FC) of default-mode network (DMN), salience network (SN), and central executive network (CEN). Static FC (sFC) and dynamic FC (dFC) combined with triple network model can better study the dynamic and static changes of brain networks, and improve its potential diagnostic value in the diagnosis of AD spectrum disorders. Methods: Differences in sFC values and dFC variability patterns among the three brain networks of the three groups (53 AD patients, 40 aMCI patients, and 40 NCs) were computed by ANOVA using Gaussian Random Field theory (GRF) correction. The correlation between FC values (sFC values and dFC variability) in the three networks and cognitive scores (MMSE and MoCA) in AD and aMCI groups was analyzed separately. Results: Within the DMN network, there were significant differences of sFC values in right/left medial superior frontal gyrus and dFC variability in left opercular part inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus among the three groups. Within the CEN network, there were significant differences of sFC values in left superior parietal gyrus. Within the SN network, there were significant differences of dFC variability in right Cerebelum_7b and left opercular part inferior frontal gyrus. In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between FC values (sFC values of CEN and dFC variability of SN) and MMSE and MoCA scores. Conclusion: It suggests that sFC, dFC combined with triple network model can be considered as potential biomarkers for AD and aMCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.