Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107557›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nephrology and renovascular disease2023

The Implementation of a Modified Fluid Assessment Tool to Improve the Clinical Assessment, Detection, and Management of Blood Pressure Control and Fluid Alterations Among Hemodialysis Patients.

Hussam Al Nusair, Wael Hamdan, Joy Garma, Ahmed Eid, Rafi Alnjadat, Nezam Al-Nsair, Mariezl Fonbuena, Christin Davao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hussam Al NusairDialysis Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates.
Wael HamdanDialysis Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates.
Joy GarmaDialysis Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates.
Ahmed EidDialysis Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates.
Rafi AlnjadatApplied Health Sciences, Al-Balqa Applied University, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-3540
Nezam Al-NsairCollege of Nursing, Xavier University, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Mariezl FonbuenaDialysis Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates.
Christin DavaoDialysis Department, Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm Al Quwain, United Arab Emirates.
Shaikh Khalifa Medical City · AEAl-Balqa Applied University · JOXavier University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fluid overload is a common complication of the care of End-stage Renal Disease patients that may lead to prolonged hospitalization and mortality. This warrants an effective and systemic approach to early recognition and management to improve patient outcomes. Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effect of a modified fluid assessment tool to improve accurate clinical assessments, detection, and management of blood pressure control and fluid alteration among hemodialysis patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, data were collected from forty-three dialysis patients who were seen and followed up from a dialysis unit of an acute care hospital during 8 weeks of standard care. A modified assessment tool was used to systematically highlight the appropriateness of the patient set dry weight using intradialytic weight gain (IWDG) and patient blood pressure. Paired sample Result: A total of 43 patients were enrolled (mean age, 59.07) (ranges 27-88 years) (SD - 14.30); 51.16% female; 79% Emirati Nationals, with Chronic Kidney Disease. A repeated measure ANOVA analysis showed a significant difference in the mean arterial pressure within the study group based on time, over six measurements (p = 0.001). However, the difference between the pre- and post-intra-dialytic weight gain mean scores yields insignificant results (p = 0.346). Conclusion: The implementation of a modified assessment tool improved blood pressure control, increased staff and physician involvement in assessing patient dry weight facilitated through fluid status evaluation, methodical assessment of dry weight, and precise fluid removal calculation, enhancing overall blood pressure and fluid management in HD patients.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseasefluid assessmentfluid managementhemodialysismodified assessment tool

Identifiers

PMID38107557
PMCPMC10723595
OpenAlexW4389569527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.