Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107524›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience

Quantitative Comparison of Analytical Solution and Finite Element Method for Investigation of Near-infrared Light Propagation in Brain Tissue Model.

Hadi Borjkhani, Seyed Kamaledin Setarehdan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hadi BorjkhaniControl and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5495-3964
Seyed Kamaledin SetarehdanControl and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5928-8668
University of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an imaging method in which a light source and detector are installed on the head; consequently, the re-emission of light from human skin contains information about cerebral hemodynamic alteration. The spatial probability distribution profile of photons penetrating tissue at a source spot, scattering into the tissue, and being released at an appropriate detector position, represents the spatial sensitivity. Methods: Modeling light propagation in a human head is essential for quantitative near-infrared spectroscopy and optical imaging. The specific form of the distribution of light is obtained using the theory of perturbation. An analytical solution of the perturbative diffusion equation (DE) and finite element method (FEM) in a Slab media (similar to the human head) makes it possible to study light propagation due to absorption and scattering of brain tissue. Results: The simulation result indicates that sensitivity is slowly decreasing in the deep area, and the sensitivity below the source and detector is the highest. The depth sensitivity and computation time of both analytical and FEM methods are compared. The simulation time of the analytical approach is four times larger than the FEM. Conclusion: In this paper, an analytical solution and the performance of FEM methods when applied to the diffusion equation for heterogeneous media with a single spherical defect are compared. The depth sensitivity along with the computation time of simulation has been investigated for both methods. For simple and Slab modes of the human brain, the analytical solution is the right candidate. Whenever the brain model is sophisticated, it is possible to use FEM methods, but it costs a higher computation time. Highlights: Analytical and finite element method (FEM) depth sensitivity are almost the same.FEM requires more computation time, but can handle complicated head models.The analytical method is proposed for the first step and simple head models. Plain Language Summary: The functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a type of neuromonitoring that uses near-infrared light to measure brain activity indirectly and is similar to electroencephalography (EEG). A single-channel fNIRS system contains a near-infrared light source, which emits near-infrared light (NIR), and a detector is placed near the source. A light intensity change received by detectors indicates brain activity when NIR light penetrates into the gray matter. It is necessary to have a prior understanding of light penetration depth in order to measure brain activity more accurately. fNIRS can be better understood, optimized, and investigated through modeling light propagation in brain tissue. In order to study light in tissues, analytical and numerical methods can be used. In this work, we compared these two approaches quantitatively in a simple slab medium. We concluded that the numerical method takes too much time to calculate the results, but it can be applied to complicated head models. The results of these studies provide researchers with new insights into the modeling and simulation of fNIRS and diffuse optical tomography.

Indexed as

Depth sensitivity; ContrastDiffusion equation (DE)Finite element method (FEM)Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)Perturbation theory

Identifiers

PMID38107524
PMCPMC10719975
OpenAlexW3180578629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.