ArticleInterspeech2023
Motor control similarity between speakers saying "a souk" using inverse atlas tongue modeling.
Article in Interspeech, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Finite element models (FEM) of the tongue have facilitated speech studies through analysis of internal muscle forces indirectly derived from imaging data. In this work, we build a uniform hexahedral FEM of a tongue atlas constructed from magnetic resonance imaging data of a healthy population. The FEM is driven by inverse internal tongue tissue kinematics of speakers temporally aligned and deformed into the same atlas space, while performing the speech task "a souk" allowing muscle activation predictions. This work aims to investigate the commonalities in tongue motor strategies in the articulation of "a souk" predicted by the inverse tongue atlas model. Our findings report variability among five speakers for estimated muscle activations with a similarity index using a dynamic time warp function. Two speakers show similarity index > 0.9 and two others < 0.7 with respect to a reference speaker for most tongue muscles. The relative motion tracking error of the model is less than 2% which is promising for speech study applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.