ArticleJournal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research
Study of hesperetin effect on modulating transcription levels of MLH1 and MSH2 genes in SKBR3 breast cancer cell line.
Article in Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hesperidin and Hesperetin: Epigenetic-Stemness Crosstalk, Antitumor Mechanisms, Preclinical Data and Translation Barriers.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- The Effect of NF-κB Deactivation on Cancer Cell Response to ALA Mediated Photodynamic Therapy.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hesperetin (HSP), a flavonoid, has been validated to modify gene expression and function as an epigenetic agent to stop the development of breast carcinoma cells. HSP was investigated in this research to evaluate the expression of the MLH1 and MSH2 genes in cancerous breast cell lines (SKBR3) and healthy cell lines (MCF-11A) after exposure to different dosages (200, 400, and 600 µM/mL) of HSP. After 48 h of exposure, SKBR3's half-maximal inhibitory concentration was 289.6 µM/mL and MCF-10A's was 855.4 µM/mL. The research found that increasing HSP concentrations were closely correlated with an increase in MLH1 gene levels in the SKBR3 cell line, as shown by median and percentile values. HSP therapy caused the MLH1 gene expression to substantially vary in different groups, and in the SKBR3 cell line, MSH2 gene expressions were elevated in a dose-escalating manner. Moreover, HSP also raised the number of apoptotic cells, with the fraction of apoptotic cells escalating substantially at doses of 400 and 600 µM/mL. The outcomes suggested that HSP has the potential to be utilized as a therapeutic intervention for breast cancer, as it can induce apoptosis and reduce cell viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.