Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107421›Full record

ArticleMolecular physics2023

Structure and interaction of therapeutic proteins in solution: a combined simulation and experimental study.

Suman Saurabh, Zongyi Li, Peter Hollowell, Thomas Waigh, Peixun Li, John Webster, John M Seddon, Cavan Kalonia, Jian R Lu, Fernando Bresme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suman SaurabhDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Zongyi LiBiological Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peter HollowellBiological Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Thomas WaighBiological Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Peixun LiSTFC ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, UK.
John WebsterSTFC ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, UK.
John M SeddonDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Cavan KaloniaDosage Form Design and Development, BioPharmaceutical Development, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Jian R LuBiological Physics Group, School of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Fernando BresmeDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aggregation of therapeutic proteins in solution has attracted significant interest, driving efforts to understand the relationship between microscopic structural changes and protein-protein interactions determining aggregation processes in solution. Additionally, there is substantial interest in being able to predict aggregation based on protein structure as part of molecular developability assessments. Molecular Dynamics provides theoretical tools to complement experimental studies and to interrogate and identify the microscopic mechanisms determining aggregation. Here we perform all-atom MD simulations to study the structure and inter-protein interaction of the Fab and Fc fragments of the monoclonal antibody (mAb) COE3. We unravel the role of ion-protein interactions in building the ionic double layer and determining effective inter-protein interaction. Further, we demonstrate, using various state-of-the-art force fields (charmm, gromos, amber, opls/aa), that the protein solvation, ionic structure and protein-protein interaction depend significantly on the force field parameters. We perform SANS and Static Light Scattering experiments to assess the accuracy of the different forcefields. Comparison of the simulated and experimental results reveal significant differences in the forcefields' performance, particularly in their ability to predict the protein size in solution and inter-protein interactions quantified through the second virial coefficients. In addition, the performance of the forcefields is correlated with the protein hydration structure.

Indexed as

molecular dynamics simulationsMonoclonal antibodiespotential of mean forcevirial coefficient

Identifiers

PMID38107421
PMCPMC10721229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.