Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107304›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Review on 3D printing techniques for cutting tools with cooling channels.

Anuj Srivathsa S S, Muralidharan B

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anuj Srivathsa S SDepartment of Manufacturing, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India, 632014.
Muralidharan BDepartment of Manufacturing, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India, 632014.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review paper critically emphasizes the possibilities and recent developments for producing high-performance conventional cutting tools that are in demand in the traditional machining industry. These cutting tools are considered for use in traditional machining of materials that provide a high strength-to-weight ratio for various applications with high precision. This review focuses on the machinability of turning, milling, drilling, and other special tools manufactured using various additive manufacturing methods. The materials and methods used are also studied, enabling us to understand the vast requirements of tool materials and the additive manufacturing methods available for production. The critical suggestions discussed would establish a platform for the selection of printing methods and printing strategies to develop cutting tools with complex internal geometries.

Indexed as

Additive manufacturingAdvanced toolingCutting toolsHigh-speed machining

Identifiers

PMID38107304
PMCPMC10724563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.