Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107286›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Factors contributing to dropping out of adults' programming e-learning.

Aiste Dirzyte, Aidas Perminas, Lukas Kaminskis, Giedrius Žebrauskas, Živilė Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Jolita Šliogerienė, Jelena Suchanova, Romualda Rimašiūtė-Knabikienė, Aleksandras Patapas, Indre Gajdosikiene

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aiste DirzyteFaculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio ave. 11, Vilnius 10221, Lithuania.
Aidas PerminasDepartment of Psychology, Vytautas Magnus University, K. Donelaičio str. 58, Kaunas 44248, Lithuania.
Lukas KaminskisTuring College, Gedimino ave. 5A, Vilnius 01122, Lithuania.
Giedrius ŽebrauskasTuring College, Gedimino ave. 5A, Vilnius 01122, Lithuania.
Živilė Sederevičiūtė-PačiauskienėFaculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio ave. 11, Vilnius 10221, Lithuania.
Jolita ŠliogerienėFaculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio ave. 11, Vilnius 10221, Lithuania.
Jelena SuchanovaFaculty of Creative Industries, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio ave. 11, Vilnius 10221, Lithuania.
Romualda Rimašiūtė-KnabikienėInstitute of Psychology, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities 20, Vilnius 08303, Lithuania.
Aleksandras PatapasInstitute of Public Administration, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities 20, Vilnius 08303, Lithuania.
Indre GajdosikieneInstitute of Psychology, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities 20, Vilnius 08303, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies reported that acquiring computer programming skills is challenging and might result in high dropout rates. A quasi-experimental design was used to examine the role of different factors in dropping out of an e-based computer programming course. This study applied a knowledge in programming assessment test (20 multiple-choice questions covering the following topics: variables, loops, conditionals, functions, and general knowledge of Python), The Learning Motivating Factors Questionnaire, The Big Five-2, and The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction & Frustration Scale. Ninety-four participants (38 males and 56 females) completed the course, while 305 participants started it. The mean age of e-learners was 29.96 years (SD 8.27), age range = 18 to 54. The results showed that e-learners who completed the course had higher initial knowledge assessment scores than those who dropped out after the first assessment. Reward and recognition as a motivator were significantly higher in males who completed the course than those who dropped out after the second knowledge assessment. Extraversion was significantly lower in females who completed the course than those who dropped after the first or second knowledge assessment test. Relatedness frustration was significantly higher in those who dropped out after the first knowledge assessment. Due to significant limitations of the sample size, cultural context, measures applied, and research design, the findings would preferably be regarded with caution.

Indexed as

21st century skillsAdult learningApplications in subject areasDistance education and e-learningGender studies

Identifiers

PMID38107286
PMCPMC10724553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.