Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107251›Full record

ArticleCrystal growth & design2020

Polymorphism in Solid Dispersions.

Karina Sanabria Ortiz, José R Hernández Espinell, Desire Ortiz Torres, Vilmalí Lopéz-Mejías, Torsten Stelzer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crystal growth & design, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karina Sanabria OrtizDepartment of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931, United States.
José R Hernández EspinellDepartment of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931, United States.
Desire Ortiz TorresDepartment of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931, United States.
Vilmalí Lopéz-MejíasDepartment of Chemistry, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00931, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-8414
Torsten StelzerCrystallization Design Institute, Molecular Sciences Research Center, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00926, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3881-0183
University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras · PRUniversity of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus · PR

Funding

Upgrade Laboratories Facilities at UPR-Rio PiedrasR25GM061151 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS · PI CARBALLEIRA, NESTOR MANUEL · 2001 to 2023
$32.5M
TRANSLATIONAL PROTEOMICS CENTERG12MD007600 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI FERNANDEZ-REPOLLET, EMMA · 2012 to 2016
$11.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM061151NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid dispersions embed active pharmaceutical ingredients in polymeric carriers to improve their solubility. Three solid dispersion preparation techniques are typically employed: solvent evaporation, solvent-fusion, and fusion methods. Although these are also widely recommended as preparative methods for phase diagram determination, few examples exist concerning their effect on the resulting polymorph, once the solid dispersion is produced. In this study, the influence of these methods on the polymorphic form obtained in crystalline solid dispersions (CSDs) composed of flufenamic acid (FFA) and poly(ethylene glycol) was investigated. The physical mixtures and CSDs were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. The results reveal that the fusion method leads to concomitant polymorphs (mainly FFA I and III) in the CSDs. In contrast, the solvent evaporation and solvent-fusion methods lead to FFA III. Collectively, these results demonstrate that preparative methods have a significant influence on the phase diagrams determined (average relative deviation ≤8%), which are often used to justify the design space of manufacturing processes, including those deemed "continuous." Consequently, choosing a preparation method that results in the desired polymorph is crucial to ensure accurate determination of phase diagrams and critical quality attributes of formulations.

Identifiers

PMID38107251
PMCPMC10723824
OpenAlexW2995730653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.