ArticleCrystal growth & design2020
Polymorphism in Solid Dispersions.
Article in Crystal growth & design, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- A review of precision medicine in developing pharmaceutical products: Perspectives and opportunities.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Unveiling a Novel Solvatomorphism of Anti-inflammatory Flufenamic Acid: X-ray Structure, Quantum Chemical, andACS omega · 2024Article
- Solubility and Physical Stability Enhancement of Loratadine by Preparation of Co-Amorphous Solid Dispersion with Chlorpheniramine and Polyvinylpyrrolidone.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Role of Heteronucleants in Melt Crystallization of Crystalline Solid Dispersions.Crystal growth & design · 2023Article
- Solvent-Mediated Polymorphic Transformations in Molten Polymers: The Account of Acetaminophen.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Solid dispersions embed active pharmaceutical ingredients in polymeric carriers to improve their solubility. Three solid dispersion preparation techniques are typically employed: solvent evaporation, solvent-fusion, and fusion methods. Although these are also widely recommended as preparative methods for phase diagram determination, few examples exist concerning their effect on the resulting polymorph, once the solid dispersion is produced. In this study, the influence of these methods on the polymorphic form obtained in crystalline solid dispersions (CSDs) composed of flufenamic acid (FFA) and poly(ethylene glycol) was investigated. The physical mixtures and CSDs were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. The results reveal that the fusion method leads to concomitant polymorphs (mainly FFA I and III) in the CSDs. In contrast, the solvent evaporation and solvent-fusion methods lead to FFA III. Collectively, these results demonstrate that preparative methods have a significant influence on the phase diagrams determined (average relative deviation ≤8%), which are often used to justify the design space of manufacturing processes, including those deemed "continuous." Consequently, choosing a preparation method that results in the desired polymorph is crucial to ensure accurate determination of phase diagrams and critical quality attributes of formulations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.