Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107225›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2023

Growth performance of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with amylase and protease enzymes individually or combined.

Khadija S Radhi, Muhammad Arif, Abd Ur Rehman, Muhammad Faizan, Najlaa H Almohmadi, Islam M Youssef, Ayman A Swelum, Gamaleldin M Suliman, Mohamed Tharwat, Alia Ebrahim and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Khadija S RadhiDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Science, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad ArifDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Abd Ur RehmanDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Muhammad FaizanDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Najlaa H AlmohmadiClinical Nutrition Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Islam M YoussefAnimal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, Egypt.
Ayman A SwelumDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Gamaleldin M SulimanDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed TharwatDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia.
Alia EbrahimJiangsu Key Laboratory for Microbes and Genomics, School of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
Mohamed E Abd El-HackPoultry Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Khalid M MahrosePoultry Production Department, Faculty of Technology and Development, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
University of Sargodha · PKKing Saud University · SAZagazig University · EGAgricultural Research Center · EGNanjing Normal University · CNQassim University · SATaif University · SAUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Feed additives that increase nutrient availability in feeds have gained a lot of interest. Aim: An experiment was conducted to determine whether amylase, protease, and their combined supplementation affected broiler performance. Methods: Two hundred eighty broiler chicks were selected and distributed randomly into 28 replicate pens with four treatment groups and seven replicates under a completely randomized design. A total of four diets were developed, having 0, 100, 100, and 100 + 100 g of control (AP0), amylase (A1), protease (P1), and amylase + protease (AP1)/ton of feed, respectively. Four replicates of each treatment were fed each diet. Each diet was randomly allotted to each group. Results: Differences were insignificant between 100 g/ton of amylase supplementation and FI, body weight gain (BWG), or feed conversion ratio (FCR) ( Conclusion: In conclusion, amylase, protease, and their combined supplementation at a rate of 100 g/ton of feed did not influence BWG, FI, FCR, carcass characteristics, or organ weight.

Indexed as

AmylasesChickensAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsPeptide HydrolasesAmylasesPeptide HydrolasesAmylaseAnimalsBroilerGrowth performanceProtease

Identifiers

PMID38107225
PMCPMC10725294
OpenAlexW4389292096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.