Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107189›Full record

ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2023

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Molecular Diffusion in Metal-Organic Frameworks Accounting for the Impact of Framework Flexibility.

Yuhan Yang, Zhenzi Yu, David S Sholl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Facilitating Screening of MOFs for Mixed Matrix Membranes Using Machine Learning and the Maxwell Model.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuhan YangSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9004-8192
Zhenzi YuSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States.
David S ShollSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0100, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2771-9168

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular diffusion in MOFs plays an important role in determining whether equilibrium can be reached in adsorption-based chemical separations and is a key driving force in membrane-based separations. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have shown that in some cases inclusion of framework flexibility in MOF changes predicted molecular diffusivities by orders of magnitude relative to more efficient MD simulations using rigid structures. Despite this, all previous efforts to predict molecular diffusion in MOFs in a high-throughput way have relied on MD data from rigid structures. We use a diverse data set of MD simulations in flexible and rigid MOFs to develop a classification model that reliably predicts whether framework flexibility has a strong impact on molecular diffusion in a given MOF/molecule pair. We then combine this approach with previous high-throughput MD simulations to develop a reliable model that efficiently predicts molecular diffusivities in cases in which framework flexibility can be neglected. The use of this approach is illustrated by making predictions of molecular diffusivities in ∼70,000 MOF/molecule pairs for molecules relevant to gas separations.

Identifiers

PMID38107189
PMCPMC10720339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.