Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38107166›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

Replacing academic journals.

Björn Brembs, Philippe Huneman, Felix Schönbrodt, Gustav Nilsonne, Toma Susi, Renke Siems, Pandelis Perakakis, Varvara Trachana, Lai Ma, Sara Rodriguez-Cuadrado

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Towards the year 2049: The next 25 years of occupational health and safety research.Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Björn BrembsUniversität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7824-7650
Philippe HunemanIHPST, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7789-6197
Felix SchönbrodtLMU, Munich, Germany.
Gustav NilsonneKarolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5273-0150
Toma SusiUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-573X
Renke SiemsReutlingen, Germany.
Pandelis PerakakisComplutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Varvara TrachanaUniversity of Thessaly, Larisa, Greece.
Lai MaUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sara Rodriguez-CuadradoAutonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replacing traditional journals with a more modern solution is not a new idea. Here, we propose ways to overcome the social dilemma underlying the decades of inaction. Any solution needs to not only resolve the current problems but also be capable of preventing takeover by corporations: it needs to replace traditional journals with a decentralized, resilient, evolvable network that is interconnected by open standards and open-source norms under the governance of the scholarly community. It needs to replace the monopolies connected to journals with a genuine, functioning and well-regulated market. In this new market, substitutable service providers compete and innovate according to the conditions of the scholarly community, avoiding sustained vendor lock-in. Therefore, a standards body needs to form under the governance of the scholarly community to allow the development of open scholarly infrastructures servicing the entire research workflow. We propose a redirection of money from legacy publishers to the new network by funding bodies broadening their minimal infrastructure requirements at recipient institutions to include modern infrastructure components replacing and complementing journal functionalities. Such updated eligibility criteria by funding agencies would help realign the financial incentives for recipient institutions with public and scholarly interest.

Indexed as

affordabilityfunctionality‌infrastructurepublishingreplicabilityscholarly

Identifiers

PMID38107166
PMCPMC10723084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.